[Bug fortran/61819] [4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_descriptor_data_get

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61819 --- Comment #21 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > I just submitted a new bug. It is a pity that my code cannot be compiled > with gfortran 4.9 and above for more than a year now.. (Part of) your code should compile with the 5.3.0 release.

[Bug fortran/61819] [4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_descriptor_data_get

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61819 --- Comment #22 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Hossein Talebi from comment #20) > I just submitted a new bug. It is a pity that my code cannot be compiled > with gfortran 4.9 and above for more than a year now.. It is comments

[Bug fortran/61819] [4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_descriptor_data_get

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61819 --- Comment #23 from Hossein Talebi --- Thank you also for the great work and such a nice compiler. I should have actually noticed this a lot sooner but I was trying to keep my code compiling with gcc 4.8. > It is comments like the above that

[Bug fortran/61819] [4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_descriptor_data_get

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61819 --- Comment #18 from Hossein Talebi --- I am now trying this bug and the Bug 68415 with the new GCC from trunc and it is fine. Nevertheless, this other code does not compile. (gcc version 6.0.0 20151129 (experimental)) Module

[Bug fortran/61819] [4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_descriptor_data_get

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61819 --- Comment #19 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Hossein Talebi from comment #18) > I am now trying this bug and the Bug 68415 with the new GCC from trunc and > it is fine. Nevertheless, this other code does not compile. > (gcc

[Bug fortran/61819] [4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_descriptor_data_get

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61819 --- Comment #20 from Hossein Talebi --- I just submitted a new bug. It is a pity that my code cannot be compiled with gfortran 4.9 and above for more than a year now.. On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 9:01 PM, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org <

[Bug fortran/61819] [4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_descriptor_data_get

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61819 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||talebi.hossein at gmail dot com

[Bug fortran/61819] [4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_descriptor_data_get

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61819 --- Comment #15 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Wed Nov 4 20:00:19 2015 New Revision: 229777 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229777=gcc=rev Log: 2015-01-25 Paul Thomas Backported from trunk.

[Bug fortran/61819] [4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_descriptor_data_get

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61819 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/61819] [4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_descriptor_data_get

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61819 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|NEW Resolution|DUPLICATE

[Bug fortran/61819] [4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_descriptor_data_get

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61819 --- Comment #13 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sun Oct 25 21:31:12 2015 New Revision: 229303 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229303=gcc=rev Log: 2015-01-25 Paul Thomas PR fortran/67171 *

[Bug fortran/61819] [4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_descriptor_data_get

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61819 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #14

[Bug fortran/61819] [4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_descriptor_data_get

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61819 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added CC||janus at

[Bug fortran/61819] [4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_descriptor_data_get

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61819 --- Comment #7 from Salvatore Filippone sfilippone at uniroma2 dot it --- The original code leaks memory like a sieve, and looks suspiciously similar to PR55603. It is just possible that the whole area of function results needs to be reviewed (I

[Bug fortran/61819] [4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_descriptor_data_get

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61819 --- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr --- The following PRs give an ICE at the same place: pr54784, pr59765, pr60529, and pr61766.

[Bug fortran/61819] [4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_descriptor_data_get

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61819 --- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr --- Note that the original test of pr54784 now gives the same ICE and the change of behavior is in the range given in comment 6.

[Bug fortran/61819] [4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_descriptor_data_get

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61819 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added CC||damian

[Bug fortran/61819] [4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_descriptor_data_get

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61819 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED