[Bug fortran/68567] ICE on using wrong defined arrays (different cases/messages)

2019-04-03 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68567 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/68567] ICE on using wrong defined arrays (different cases/messages)

2019-04-03 Thread dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68567 --- Comment #9 from dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: dominiq Date: Wed Apr 3 21:32:13 2019 New Revision: 270137 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270137=gcc=rev Log: 2019-04-03 Steven G. Kargl PR fortran/68567 *

[Bug fortran/68567] ICE on using wrong defined arrays (different cases/messages)

2019-04-03 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68567 --- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Packaging submitted at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2019-04/msg7.html.

[Bug fortran/68567] ICE on using wrong defined arrays (different cases/messages)

2019-04-02 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68567 --- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres --- For the record, the tests in comment 1 compile without ICE since GCC6. Unless someone beats me, I am planning to package the patch in comment 4 and submit it to the mailing lists.

[Bug fortran/68567] ICE on using wrong defined arrays (different cases/messages)

2018-03-08 Thread anlauf at gmx dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68567 Harald Anlauf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gmx dot de --- Comment #6

[Bug fortran/68567] ICE on using wrong defined arrays (different cases/messages)

2016-11-21 Thread law at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68567 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 CC|

[Bug fortran/68567] ICE on using wrong defined arrays (different cases/messages)

2016-08-23 Thread gerhard.steinmetz.fort...@t-online.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68567 --- Comment #5 from Gerhard Steinmetz --- > We must be using drastically different compilers. No, I've simply forgotten to include a subcatalog with testfiles zz*. Sorry for my blotchiness. The patch looks

[Bug fortran/68567] ICE on using wrong defined arrays (different cases/messages)

2016-08-22 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68567 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/68567] ICE on using wrong defined arrays (different cases/messages)

2016-08-22 Thread gerhard.steinmetz.fort...@t-online.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68567 --- Comment #3 from Gerhard Steinmetz --- ICE is gone for all tested constellations with gcc-Version 7.0.0 20160821 (experimental) (GCC)

[Bug fortran/68567] ICE on using wrong defined arrays (different cases/messages)

2015-11-26 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68567 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/68567] ICE on using wrong defined arrays (different cases/messages)

2015-11-26 Thread gerhard.steinmetz.fort...@t-online.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68567 --- Comment #1 from Gerhard Steinmetz --- $ cat z1.f90 program p integer, parameter :: a(2.,2) = 1 integer, parameter :: b(2) = a(1:2, 2) end $ gfortran -g -O0 -Wall -fcheck=all z1.f90 f951: