[Bug fortran/78797] It is time perhaps to implement -std=f2015
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78797 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|--- |8.0 --- Comment #10 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Harald Anlauf from comment #8) > As -std=f2018 will be available in 8.0 and replaces -std=f2015, > shouldn't this bug be closed? Yes, gfortran 8 has -std=f2018. Closing.
[Bug fortran/78797] It is time perhaps to implement -std=f2015
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78797 Vladimir Fuka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vladimir.fuka at gmail dot com --- Comment #9 from Vladimir Fuka --- (In reply to janus from comment #3) > (In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #2) > > I will post the existence of this PR to the list over the weekend togetehr > > with: ftp://ftp.nag.co.uk/sc22wg5/n1551-n1600/n1579.pdf > > This document describes the new features of Fortran 2003, and I know that > there is also one for 2008. But what about 2015? There is one for Fortran 2015 as well. https://doi.org/10.1145/3131212.3131213 I am not sure if there is a non-paywall version.
[Bug fortran/78797] It is time perhaps to implement -std=f2015
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78797 Harald Anlauf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gmx dot de --- Comment #8 from Harald Anlauf --- As -std=f2018 will be available in 8.0 and replaces -std=f2015, shouldn't this bug be closed?
[Bug fortran/78797] It is time perhaps to implement -std=f2015
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78797 --- Comment #7 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to janus from comment #6) > Ok. Btw, the draft version of the F15 standard linked from the gfortran wiki > is: > > http://j3-fortran.org/doc/year/15/15-007.pdf > > (from December 2014). Is this the last version, or this there a more recent > one? Answering that myself, I just found: http://j3-fortran.org/doc/year/16/16-007r1.pdf
[Bug fortran/78797] It is time perhaps to implement -std=f2015
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78797 --- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to paul.richard.tho...@gmail.com from comment #5) > I do apologise, it seems that Mr Reid did not do his usual update. We > will have to work from the draft standard itself. Ok. Btw, the draft version of the F15 standard linked from the gfortran wiki is: http://j3-fortran.org/doc/year/15/15-007.pdf (from December 2014). Is this the last version, or this there a more recent one?
[Bug fortran/78797] It is time perhaps to implement -std=f2015
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78797 --- Comment #5 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com --- I do apologise, it seems that Mr Reid did not do his usual update. We will have to work from the draft standard itself. Paul On 14 December 2016 at 20:36, paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78797 > > --- Comment #4 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com at gmail dot com> --- > Hi Janus, > > Yes there is one - I had it open but somehow provided the link to the > wrong one... > > Paul > > On 14 December 2016 at 19:20, janus at gcc dot gnu.org > wrote: >> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78797 >> >> --- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- >> (In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #2) >>> I will post the existence of this PR to the list over the weekend togetehr >>> with: ftp://ftp.nag.co.uk/sc22wg5/n1551-n1600/n1579.pdf >> >> This document describes the new features of Fortran 2003, and I know that >> there >> is also one for 2008. But what about 2015? >> >> -- >> You are receiving this mail because: >> You reported the bug. > > -- > You are receiving this mail because: > You reported the bug.
[Bug fortran/78797] It is time perhaps to implement -std=f2015
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78797 --- Comment #4 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com --- Hi Janus, Yes there is one - I had it open but somehow provided the link to the wrong one... Paul On 14 December 2016 at 19:20, janus at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78797 > > --- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- > (In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #2) >> I will post the existence of this PR to the list over the weekend togetehr >> with: ftp://ftp.nag.co.uk/sc22wg5/n1551-n1600/n1579.pdf > > This document describes the new features of Fortran 2003, and I know that > there > is also one for 2008. But what about 2015? > > -- > You are receiving this mail because: > You reported the bug.
[Bug fortran/78797] It is time perhaps to implement -std=f2015
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78797 --- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #2) > I will post the existence of this PR to the list over the weekend togetehr > with: ftp://ftp.nag.co.uk/sc22wg5/n1551-n1600/n1579.pdf This document describes the new features of Fortran 2003, and I know that there is also one for 2008. But what about 2015?
[Bug fortran/78797] It is time perhaps to implement -std=f2015
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78797 --- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to janus from comment #1) > +1 > > Can you remind us which F15 features we have already? > > On https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortran/News I see: > * Support for IMPLICIT NONE (external, type). > * ERROR STOP is now permitted in pure procedures. > > Anything else? Assumed type and assumed rank(partial). I thought that we had implemented the RANK intrinsic as well but the Chivers et al. table shows N. There are rather a lot of features that are obsolete or deleted in F2015: Labeled DO loops have been redundant since Fortran 90 and are now specified to be obsolescent. The arithmetic IF statement has been deleted. The EQUIVALENCE and COMMON statements and the block data program unit have been redundant since Fortran 90 and are now specified to be obsolescent. The nonblock DO construct has been deleted. The FORALL is now specified to be obsolescent. What has been done with intrinsics, I am not sure; eg. has COSHAPE been implemented? I will post the existence of this PR to the list over the weekend togetehr with: ftp://ftp.nag.co.uk/sc22wg5/n1551-n1600/n1579.pdf Cheers Paul
[Bug fortran/78797] It is time perhaps to implement -std=f2015
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78797 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed||2016-12-13 CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- +1 Can you remind us which F15 features we have already? On https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortran/News I see: * Support for IMPLICIT NONE (external, type). * ERROR STOP is now permitted in pure procedures. Anything else?
