https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79072
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79072
--- Comment #22 from Neil Carlson ---
I just verified with 8.0 trunk (r257868) that all three of my examples continue
to work as expected.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79072
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79072
--- Comment #20 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Thu Nov 23 21:02:48 2017
New Revision: 255120
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255120&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-11-23 Paul Thomas
Backported from trunk
PR fortra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79072
--- Comment #19 from Neil Carlson ---
This fixes the code of comment 12 for me. All the other test cases continue to
work as expected. This can be closed as "fixed" as far as I'm concerned.
Thanks Paul!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79072
--- Comment #18 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Wed Nov 22 11:37:16 2017
New Revision: 255053
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255053&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-11-22 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/79072
* trans-stmt.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79072
--- Comment #17 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to neil.n.carlson from comment #16)
> I've confirmed Dominique's findings: Code in comments 0, 5, 11 are working
> now with Paul's commit (Thanks!), but comment 12 code still gives an ICE.
>
> Shoul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79072
--- Comment #16 from neil.n.carlson at gmail dot com ---
I've confirmed Dominique's findings: Code in comments 0, 5, 11 are working now
with Paul's commit (Thanks!), but comment 12 code still gives an ICE.
Should I create a new PR for that exampl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79072
--- Comment #15 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Mon Nov 20 19:09:34 2017
New Revision: 254966
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254966&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-11-20 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/79072
* trans-expr.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79072
--- Comment #14 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
The patch at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2017-11/msg00103.html fixes
gfortran for the tests in comment 0, 5 and 11, but not for the test in comment
12:
internal compiler error: tree check: expecte
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79072
--- Comment #13 from neil.n.carlson at gmail dot com ---
Correction to Comment 11. That example gives the *correct* result on 6.4.1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79072
--- Comment #12 from neil.n.carlson at gmail dot com ---
The second adds a select case and print to get at the result value before its
handed back. This produces an ICE with 6.4.1, 7.2.1, and 8.0.0 (20171028)
character(3), target :: a = 'foo'
cl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79072
--- Comment #11 from neil.n.carlson at gmail dot com ---
Paul, I'm organizing all my bug report examples, and ran across these two test
cases from September that I can't find I ever reported. They are VERY similar
to the original example I posted
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79072
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
Assigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79072
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79072
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79072
--- Comment #8 from neil.n.carlson at gmail dot com ---
Ping. Is there any interest in fixing this regression?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79072
--- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Comment 5 code example gives incorrect results with the 7.1.0 release,
> but correct results with 6.3 and 5.2 -- a regression.
Likely caused by revision r241439. AFAICT this could be two different P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79072
neil.n.carlson at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||7.1.0
--- Comment #6 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79072
--- Comment #5 from neil.n.carlson at gmail dot com ---
Here's a more complete example that avoids the ICE.
It gives correct results with 6.3:
5 fubar
5 fubar
But incorrect results with 7.0:
5 fubar
0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79072
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-invalid-code |
Known to work|4.7.4
21 matches
Mail list logo