[Bug fortran/88248] [F18] Bogus warning about obsolescent feature: Labeled DO statement

2019-02-14 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88248 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/88248] [F18] Bogus warning about obsolescent feature: Labeled DO statement

2019-02-14 Thread anlauf at gmx dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88248 --- Comment #9 from Harald Anlauf --- Fixed.

[Bug fortran/88248] [F18] Bogus warning about obsolescent feature: Labeled DO statement

2019-02-14 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88248 --- Comment #8 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: anlauf Date: Thu Feb 14 20:24:54 2019 New Revision: 268895 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268895=gcc=rev Log: 2019-02-14 Harald Anlauf PR fortran/88248 *

[Bug fortran/88248] [F18] Bogus warning about obsolescent feature: Labeled DO statement

2019-02-13 Thread anlauf at gmx dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88248 --- Comment #7 from Harald Anlauf --- Patch submitted: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2019-02/msg00112.html

[Bug fortran/88248] [F18] Bogus warning about obsolescent feature: Labeled DO statement

2019-02-12 Thread anlauf at gmx dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88248 --- Comment #6 from Harald Anlauf --- Moving the check from gfc_define_st_label to gfc_reference_st_label: Index: symbol.c === --- symbol.c(revision 268826) +++ symbol.c

[Bug fortran/88248] [F18] Bogus warning about obsolescent feature: Labeled DO statement

2018-12-21 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88248 --- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to kargl from comment #4) > (In reply to G. Steinmetz from comment #0) > > Branching out via END=, ERR= or EOR= specifier in combination with > > CONTINUE is interpreted as a labeled DO

[Bug fortran/88248] [F18] Bogus warning about obsolescent feature: Labeled DO statement

2018-12-21 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88248 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug fortran/88248] [F18] Bogus warning about obsolescent feature: Labeled DO statement

2018-12-21 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88248 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug fortran/88248] [F18] Bogus warning about obsolescent feature: Labeled DO statement

2018-12-01 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88248 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gmx dot de --- Comment

[Bug fortran/88248] [F18] Bogus warning about obsolescent feature: Labeled DO statement

2018-12-01 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88248 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/88248] [F18] Bogus warning about obsolescent feature: Labeled DO statement

2018-11-28 Thread gs...@t-online.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88248 --- Comment #1 from G. Steinmetz --- For completeness, similar with outdated return labels : $ cat z3.f90 program p do call sub (*98, *99) end do 98 continue 99 continue end $ gfortran-9-20181125 -c z3.f90 -std=f2008