[Bug fortran/95544] ICE in gfc_can_put_var_on_stack, at fortran/trans-decl.c:494

2020-06-14 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95544

anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |FIXED
 Status|NEW |RESOLVED

--- Comment #10 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Fixed on master for GCC-11, and backported to 10-branch along with the fix
for pr93366, which is a prerequisite for this one.

Backport to 9-branch would require additional work.  Since this is not a
regression and an ICE on invalid, not done.  Closing.

Thanks for the report!

[Bug fortran/95544] ICE in gfc_can_put_var_on_stack, at fortran/trans-decl.c:494

2020-06-14 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95544

--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits  ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b0feef39fe53fbc46c22ac0c745f91dbf96cdd00

commit r10-8302-gb0feef39fe53fbc46c22ac0c745f91dbf96cdd00
Author: Harald Anlauf 
Date:   Thu Jun 11 20:29:45 2020 +0200

PR fortran/95544 - Fix ICE in NULL() argument to intrinsics

Fortran 2018: An argument to an intrinsic procedure other than ASSOCIATED,
NULL, or PRESENT shall be a data object.  An EXPR_NULL is not a data
object.  Add checks for intrinsics.

2020-06-11  Steven G. Kargl  
Harald Anlauf  

gcc/fortran/
PR fortran/95544
* check.c (invalid_null_arg): Rename to gfc_invalid_null_arg.
(gfc_check_associated, gfc_check_kind, gfc_check_merge)
(gfc_check_shape, gfc_check_size, gfc_check_spread)
(gfc_check_transfer): Adjust.
(gfc_check_len_lentrim, gfc_check_trim): Check for NULL() argument.
* gfortran.h: Declare gfc_invalid_null_arg ().
* intrinsic.c (check_arglist): Check for NULL() argument.

(cherry picked from commit 7fd614ee818983274eb5e47cbb8ec68b20994963)

[Bug fortran/95544] ICE in gfc_can_put_var_on_stack, at fortran/trans-decl.c:494

2020-06-11 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95544

--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits  ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7fd614ee818983274eb5e47cbb8ec68b20994963

commit r11-1240-g7fd614ee818983274eb5e47cbb8ec68b20994963
Author: Harald Anlauf 
Date:   Thu Jun 11 20:29:45 2020 +0200

PR fortran/95544 - Fix ICE in NULL() argument to intrinsics

Fortran 2018: An argument to an intrinsic procedure other than ASSOCIATED,
NULL, or PRESENT shall be a data object.  An EXPR_NULL is not a data
object.  Add checks for intrinsics.

2020-06-11  Steven G. Kargl  
Harald Anlauf  

gcc/fortran/
PR fortran/95544
* check.c (invalid_null_arg): Rename to gfc_invalid_null_arg.
(gfc_check_associated, gfc_check_kind, gfc_check_merge)
(gfc_check_shape, gfc_check_size, gfc_check_spread)
(gfc_check_transfer): Adjust.
(gfc_check_len_lentrim, gfc_check_trim): Check for NULL() argument.
* gfortran.h: Declare gfc_invalid_null_arg ().
* intrinsic.c (check_arglist): Check for NULL() argument.

[Bug fortran/95544] ICE in gfc_can_put_var_on_stack, at fortran/trans-decl.c:494

2020-06-08 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95544

--- Comment #7 from Steve Kargl  ---
On Mon, Jun 08, 2020 at 08:02:48PM +, anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95544
> 
> anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
> 
>What|Removed |Added
> 
>  CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
> 
> --- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
> Created attachment 48708
>   --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48708=edit
> Cleaned up patch
> 
> Hi Steve,
> 
> since there is already a function invalid_null_arg(), it can be reused.
> 
> If you do not object, I'll package it for you.
> 

No problem.  I was aware of invalid_null_arg(), but
simply copied a nearby gfc_error().

[Bug fortran/95544] ICE in gfc_can_put_var_on_stack, at fortran/trans-decl.c:494

2020-06-08 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95544

--- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Submitted for review here:

https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2020-June/054499.html

[Bug fortran/95544] ICE in gfc_can_put_var_on_stack, at fortran/trans-decl.c:494

2020-06-08 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95544

anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 48708
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48708=edit
Cleaned up patch

Hi Steve,

since there is already a function invalid_null_arg(), it can be reused.

If you do not object, I'll package it for you.

Regarding comment#4, please create a separate PR.

[Bug fortran/95544] ICE in gfc_can_put_var_on_stack, at fortran/trans-decl.c:494

2020-06-04 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95544

--- Comment #4 from Steve Kargl  ---
Likely, want to include this in the commit if someone ever gets
around to committing the patch(es).

Index: gcc/fortran/misc.c
===
--- gcc/fortran/misc.c (revision 280157)
+++ gcc/fortran/misc.c (working copy)
@@ -252,7 +252,8 @@ gfc_dummy_typename (gfc_typespec *ts)
  has_length = ts->u.cl->length != NULL;
   if (!has_length)
  {
-   if (ts->kind == gfc_default_character_kind)
+   if (ts->kind == gfc_default_character_kind
+   || ts->kind == 0)
  sprintf(buffer, "CHARACTER(*)");
else if (ts->kind < 10)
  sprintf(buffer, "CHARACTER(*,%d)", ts->kind);

[Bug fortran/95544] ICE in gfc_can_put_var_on_stack, at fortran/trans-decl.c:494

2020-06-04 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95544

--- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Updated patch to deal with comments #1.

Index: gcc/fortran/intrinsic.c
===
--- gcc/fortran/intrinsic.c (revision 280157)
+++ gcc/fortran/intrinsic.c (working copy)
@@ -4428,6 +4428,19 @@ check_arglist (gfc_actual_arglist **ap, gfc_intrinsic_
  return false;
}

+  /* F2018, p. 328: An argument to an intrinsic procedure other than
+ASSOCIATED, NULL, or PRESENT shall be a data object.  A EXPR_NULL
+is not a data object.  */
+  if (actual->expr->expr_type == EXPR_NULL
+ && !(strcmp(gfc_current_intrinsic, "associated") == 0
+   || strcmp(gfc_current_intrinsic, "null") == 0
+   || strcmp(gfc_current_intrinsic, "present") == 0))
+   {
+ gfc_error ("NULL() at %L cannot appear as an actual argument in %qs",
+>expr->where, gfc_current_intrinsic);
+ return false;
+   }
+
   /* If the formal argument is INTENT([IN]OUT), check for definability. 
*/
   if (formal->intent == INTENT_INOUT || formal->intent == INTENT_OUT)
{
Index: gcc/fortran/check.c
===
--- gcc/fortran/check.c (revision 280157)
+++ gcc/fortran/check.c (working copy)
@@ -3444,8 +3444,16 @@ gfc_check_len_lentrim (gfc_expr *s, gfc_expr *kind)
   if (!type_check (s, 0, BT_CHARACTER))
 return false;

+  if (s->expr_type == EXPR_NULL)
+{
+  gfc_error ("Intrinsic function NULL at %L cannot be an actual "
+"argument to %qs", >where, gfc_current_intrinsic);
+  return false;
+}
+
   if (!kind_check (kind, 1, BT_INTEGER))
 return false;
+
   if (kind && !gfc_notify_std (GFC_STD_F2003, "%qs intrinsic "
   "with KIND argument at %L",
   gfc_current_intrinsic, >where))
@@ -6377,6 +6385,13 @@ gfc_check_trim (gfc_expr *x)
 {
   if (!type_check (x, 0, BT_CHARACTER))
 return false;
+
+  if (x->expr_type == EXPR_NULL)
+{
+  gfc_error ("Intrinsic function NULL at %L cannot be an actual "
+"argument to %qs", >where, gfc_current_intrinsic);
+  return false;
+}

   if (!scalar_check (x, 0))
 return false;

[Bug fortran/95544] ICE in gfc_can_put_var_on_stack, at fortran/trans-decl.c:494

2020-06-04 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95544

kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Priority|P3  |P4
 CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
   Last reconfirmed||2020-06-04
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
There may be a better (or more restrictive) test, but this cures the issues.

Index: gcc/fortran/intrinsic.c
===
--- gcc/fortran/intrinsic.c (revision 280157)
+++ gcc/fortran/intrinsic.c (working copy)
@@ -4428,6 +4428,19 @@ check_arglist (gfc_actual_arglist **ap, gfc_intrinsic_
  return false;
}

+  /* F2018, p. 328: An argument to an intrinsic procedure other than
+ASSOCIATED, NULL, or PRESENT shall be a data object.  A EXPR_NULL
+is not a data object.  */
+  if (actual->expr->expr_type == EXPR_NULL
+ && !(strcmp(gfc_current_intrinsic, "associated") == 0
+   || strcmp(gfc_current_intrinsic, "null") == 0
+   || strcmp(gfc_current_intrinsic, "present") == 0))
+   {
+ gfc_error ("NULL() at %L cannot appear as an actual argument in %qs",
+>expr->where, gfc_current_intrinsic);
+ return false;
+   }
+
   /* If the formal argument is INTENT([IN]OUT), check for definability. 
*/
   if (formal->intent == INTENT_INOUT || formal->intent == INTENT_OUT)
{

[Bug fortran/95544] ICE in gfc_can_put_var_on_stack, at fortran/trans-decl.c:494

2020-06-04 Thread gs...@t-online.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95544

G. Steinmetz  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code

--- Comment #1 from G. Steinmetz  ---

Related :


$ cat za1.f90
program p
   character(:), allocatable :: z
   print *, len(null(z))
   print *, len_trim(null(z))
end


$ cat za2.f90
program p
   character(:), pointer :: z
   print *, len(null(z))
   print *, len_trim(null(z))
end


$ cat zz1.f90
program p
   character(:), allocatable :: z
   z = trim(null(z))
end