http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56172
--- Comment #6 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-07
17:04:37 UTC ---
Author: ian
Date: Thu Feb 7 17:04:24 2013
New Revision: 195855
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195855
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56172
--- Comment #4 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-06
22:40:26 UTC ---
Author: ian
Date: Wed Feb 6 22:40:18 2013
New Revision: 195823
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195823
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56172
Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56172
--- Comment #3 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-05
23:59:28 UTC ---
Author: ian
Date: Tue Feb 5 23:59:24 2013
New Revision: 195774
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195774
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56172
--- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2013-02-04 13:00:59 UTC ---
Thanks for the analysis.
Since you can recreate the bug, I guess the next step is to check the
mp-waitsema field in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56172
Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
