https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70184
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.3
--- Comment #11 from Ramana
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70184
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70184
--- Comment #9 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Thu Dec 1 13:47:13 2016
New Revision: 243109
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243109=gcc=rev
Log:
[TER] PR target/48863: Don't replace expressions across local
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70184
--- Comment #8 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Thu Nov 24 15:22:34 2016
New Revision: 242840
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242840=gcc=rev
Log:
[TER] PR target/48863 : Don't replace expressions across local
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70184
--- Comment #7 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4)
> With TER we delay expanding of (unsigned b) until you require its expansion
> during asm op expansion (and thus may be interleaved with asm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70184
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70184
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpelinux at gmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70184
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
With TER we delay expanding of (unsigned b) until you require its expansion
during asm op expansion (and thus may be interleaved with asm expansion code).
I believe we had this issue in the past for other
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70184
--- Comment #3 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> Does -fno-ter fix the issue?
> How does the tree level look?
You mean -fno-tree-ter?
That gives:
foo:
@ args = 0, pretend = 0, frame = 0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70184
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Does -fno-ter fix the issue?
How does the tree level look?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70184
--- Comment #1 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Things are bad already at expand time:
2: r111:SI=r0:SI
3: r112:SF=r1:SF
4: NOTE_INSN_FUNCTION_BEG
7: r0:SI=r111:SI
8: r0:SF=r112:SF
9: r0:SI=call [`__aeabi_f2uiz']
11 matches
Mail list logo
