[Bug ipa/70348] [6 Regression][openacc] ICE in visit_ref_for_mod_analysis, at ipa-prop.c

2016-04-08 Thread cesar at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70348 cesar at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug ipa/70348] [6 Regression][openacc] ICE in visit_ref_for_mod_analysis, at ipa-prop.c

2016-04-08 Thread cesar at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70348 --- Comment #10 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: cesar Date: Fri Apr 8 21:09:47 2016 New Revision: 234840 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234840=gcc=rev Log: gcc/ PR lto/70289 PR ipa/70348 PR

[Bug ipa/70348] [6 Regression][openacc] ICE in visit_ref_for_mod_analysis, at ipa-prop.c

2016-04-06 Thread cesar at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70348 --- Comment #9 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org --- The patch I posted for PR70289 a couple of days ago also resolves this issue: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-04/msg00202.html

[Bug ipa/70348] [6 Regression][openacc] ICE in visit_ref_for_mod_analysis, at ipa-prop.c

2016-04-06 Thread tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70348 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org |cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug ipa/70348] [6 Regression][openacc] ICE in visit_ref_for_mod_analysis, at ipa-prop.c

2016-04-04 Thread tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70348 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug ipa/70348] [6 Regression][openacc] ICE in visit_ref_for_mod_analysis, at ipa-prop.c

2016-04-04 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70348 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- So, given this is a P1, is anyone working on it?

[Bug ipa/70348] [6 Regression][openacc] ICE in visit_ref_for_mod_analysis, at ipa-prop.c

2016-03-23 Thread nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70348 --- Comment #5 from Nathan Sidwell --- the intended current implementation is to treat 'sum' as firstprivate. however, putting in an explicit firstprivate causes another different ICE (in lower_oacc_reductions) -- regardless of whether 'sum'

[Bug ipa/70348] [6 Regression][openacc] ICE in visit_ref_for_mod_analysis, at ipa-prop.c

2016-03-23 Thread tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70348 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nathan at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug ipa/70348] [6 Regression][openacc] ICE in visit_ref_for_mod_analysis, at ipa-prop.c

2016-03-23 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70348 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener

[Bug ipa/70348] [6 Regression][openacc] ICE in visit_ref_for_mod_analysis, at ipa-prop.c

2016-03-22 Thread jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70348 --- Comment #2 from Martin Jambor --- The problem is that there is a PARM_DECL in the IL of the function which is not listed among DECL_ARGUMENTS of the function: The function we are in is: (gdb) call debug_generic_expr(cfun->decl)

[Bug ipa/70348] [6 Regression][openacc] ICE in visit_ref_for_mod_analysis, at ipa-prop.c

2016-03-22 Thread tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70348 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||openacc

[Bug ipa/70348] [6 Regression][openacc] ICE in visit_ref_for_mod_analysis, at ipa-prop.c

2016-03-22 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70348 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org Target

[Bug ipa/70348] [6 Regression][openacc] ICE in visit_ref_for_mod_analysis, at ipa-prop.c

2016-03-21 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70348 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org