[Bug ipa/83179] [8 regression] gcc.dg/ipa/inline-1.c fail

[andrey.y.guskov at intel dot com]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83179

Andrey Guskov  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

[Bug ipa/83179] [8 regression] gcc.dg/ipa/inline-1.c fail

[andrey.y.guskov at intel dot com]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83179

--- Comment #19 from Andrey Guskov  ---
So, with all related makecheck and SPEC fails gone, we can most probably close
this one, right?

[Bug ipa/83179] [8 regression] gcc.dg/ipa/inline-1.c fail

[andrey.y.guskov at intel dot com]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83179

--- Comment #18 from Andrey Guskov  ---
Just in case that was a question to me, inline-[123].c fails are long gone, and
I don`t see any regex.* fails either.

[Bug ipa/83179] [8 regression] gcc.dg/ipa/inline-1.c fail

[hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83179

Jan Hubicka  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |WAITING

--- Comment #17 from Jan Hubicka  ---
 g++.dg/pr79095-4.C was removed by Jeff and template was fixed, so this PR may
be still about the gnu/regex.c failure.  If that is the case, can you plase
attach an reproducer?

[Bug ipa/83179] [8 regression] gcc.dg/ipa/inline-1.c fail

[hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83179

--- Comment #16 from Jan Hubicka  ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Tue Jan 30 13:50:45 2018
New Revision: 257186

URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257186=gcc=rev
Log:

PR ipa/83179
* gcc.dg/ipa/inline-2.c: Fix template.
* gcc.dg/ipa/inline-3.c: Fix template.

Modified:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/ipa/inline-2.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/ipa/inline-3.c

[Bug ipa/83179] [8 regression] gcc.dg/ipa/inline-1.c fail

[hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83179

--- Comment #15 from Jan Hubicka  ---
Hmm, so the testsuite template scanning for ipa-inline-1.c is fixed on all
targets and this PR is about the vectorizer ICE?

[Bug ipa/83179] [8 regression] gcc.dg/ipa/inline-1.c fail

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83179

Richard Biener  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Priority|P3  |P1

[Bug ipa/83179] [8 regression] gcc.dg/ipa/inline-1.c fail

[marxin at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83179

--- Comment #14 from Martin Liška  ---
It's a rounding issue that popped up again in PR83705.

[Bug ipa/83179] [8 regression] gcc.dg/ipa/inline-1.c fail

[seurer at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83179

--- Comment #13 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Sorry, that's r256279.

[Bug ipa/83179] [8 regression] gcc.dg/ipa/inline-1.c fail

[seurer at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83179

--- Comment #12 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
r256779 seems to have cleared up the inline-c.c test case failures (at least on
powerpc64) but it causes a couple other tests to fail.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83706

[Bug ipa/83179] [8 regression] gcc.dg/ipa/inline-1.c fail

[andrey.y.guskov at intel dot com]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83179

--- Comment #11 from Andrey Guskov  ---
Whoops. Sorry, 436 belongs to pr83338, even though its ICE message is the same
as 507`s.

[Bug ipa/83179] [8 regression] gcc.dg/ipa/inline-1.c fail

[andrey.y.guskov at intel dot com]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83179

--- Comment #10 from Andrey Guskov  ---
32-bit SPEC CPU2006::436 also affected.

[Bug ipa/83179] [8 regression] gcc.dg/ipa/inline-1.c fail

[seurer at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83179

seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #9 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Also on powerpc64 both BE and LE

[Bug ipa/83179] [8 regression] gcc.dg/ipa/inline-1.c fail

[clyon at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83179

Christophe Lyon  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Target|x86_64-*-*  |x86_64-*-* arm aarch64
 CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #8 from Christophe Lyon  ---
Confirmed on arm and aarch64 as well.

[Bug ipa/83179] [8 regression] gcc.dg/ipa/inline-1.c fail

[jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83179

--- Comment #7 from Martin Jambor  ---
(In reply to Andrey Guskov from comment #6)
> Simple. Those fails are due to the same revision.

I see, I have missed the very first line in your bug description and
then wondered whether that was the case.  The vectorizer issue looks
different but of course it makes sense to keep these together until we
know otherwise.

[Bug ipa/83179] [8 regression] gcc.dg/ipa/inline-1.c fail

[andrey.y.guskov at intel dot com]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83179

--- Comment #6 from Andrey Guskov  ---
Simple. Those fails are due to the same revision.

I decided not to create a truckload of separate bugs (there`s also a chance
that there are more cases to come, as 3 CPU2006 regressions are still not done
being bisected) because everything being in one place lowers the chance that
Honza accidentally misses one while fixing the others.

Is my logic flawed?

[Bug ipa/83179] [8 regression] gcc.dg/ipa/inline-1.c fail

[jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83179

--- Comment #5 from Martin Jambor  ---
Andrey, what makes you think that the g++.dg/pr79095-4.C and regex.c
issues are related to dump scan failure of ipa/inline-1.c?

[Bug ipa/83179] [8 regression] gcc.dg/ipa/inline-1.c fail

[andrey.y.guskov at intel dot com]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83179

--- Comment #4 from Andrey Guskov  ---
32-bit SPEC CPU2017::507/607 also affected:

during GIMPLE pass: vect
gnu/regex.c: In function 'regexec.constprop':
gnu/regex.c:5751:1: internal compiler error: in vectorizable_mask_load_store,
at tree-vect-stmts.c:2349
 regexec (preg, string, nmatch, pmatch, eflags)
 ^
0x74786d vectorizable_mask_load_store
../../../gcc/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.c:2348
0x7510ad vectorizable_call
../../../gcc/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.c:2652
0xe6ee48 vect_transform_stmt(gimple*, gimple_stmt_iterator*, bool*, _slp_tree*,
_slp_instance*)
../../../gcc/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.c:8826
0x760faa vect_transform_loop(_loop_vec_info*)
../../../gcc/gcc/tree-vect-loop.c:7559
0xe8355d vectorize_loops()
../../../gcc/gcc/tree-vectorizer.c:761
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
Please include the complete backtrace with any bug report.
See  for instructions.
lto-wrapper: fatal error: g++ returned 1 exit status
compilation terminated.
/bin/ld: lto-wrapper failed
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status

[Bug ipa/83179] [8 regression] gcc.dg/ipa/inline-1.c fail

[jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83179

--- Comment #3 from Martin Jambor  ---
Started with Honza's r255103.

[Bug ipa/83179] [8 regression] gcc.dg/ipa/inline-1.c fail

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83179

Richard Biener  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|--- |8.0

[Bug ipa/83179] [8 regression] gcc.dg/ipa/inline-1.c fail

[jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83179

Martin Jambor  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
   Last reconfirmed||2017-11-27
 CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #2 from Martin Jambor  ---
I see this too and thus confirmed.

[Bug ipa/83179] [8 regression] gcc.dg/ipa/inline-1.c fail

[andrey.y.guskov at intel dot com]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83179

--- Comment #1 from Andrey Guskov  ---
g++.dg/pr79095-4.C also affected:

spawn -ignore SIGHUP /work/gcc/testsuite/g++2/../../xg++
-B/work/gcc/testsuite/g++2/../../ /source/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr79095-4.C
-fno-diagnostics-show-caret -fdiagnostics-color=never -nostdinc++
-I/work/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/include/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
-I/work/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/include
-I/source/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++ -I/source/libstdc++-v3/include/backward
-I/source/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/util -fmessage-length=0 -std=gnu++98 -Wall -O3
-fdump-tree-vrp2 -S -o pr79095-4.s
FAIL: g++.dg/pr79095-4.C  -std=gnu++98  (test for warnings, line )