https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58020
Bug 58020 depends on bug 59015, which changed state.
Bug 59015 Summary: I/O of PARAMETER derived type with private component is
forbidden
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59015
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58020
Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58020
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|kargl at gcc dot gnu.org |
--- Comment #24 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58020
--- Comment #23 from Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #16)
I want to mention that there is now some additional support for IEEE in
libgfortran/config. None of those functions is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58020
Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
not likely to be helpful with respect to your
question number 2. With this email I'm asking Richard to give you a
more detailed response.
Many thanks for looking into this,
Fred
Original Message
Subject: [Bug libfortran/58020] Code for handling IEEE exceptions
Date: Tue
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58020
--- Comment #15 from fkrogh at mathalacarte dot com ---
Hi Francois-Xavier --
I'm sorry, but Richard did all the work on this, and I'm just a
sorry middle man. We are both people specializing in computational
mathematics, and thus not
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58020
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58020
--- Comment #17 from Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #16)
I want to mention that there is now some additional support for IEEE in
libgfortran/config.
Yes, I see that this has
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58020
--- Comment #18 from Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Francois-Xavier Coudert from comment #17)
IEEE_SUPPORT_* functions are allowed in specification expressions
On second thought, I think we can handle these
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58020
--- Comment #20 from Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #19)
(10) a reference to any other standard intrinsic function where each
argument is a restricted expression
Yes, but the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58020
--- Comment #19 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu ---
On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 04:10:00PM +, fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58020
--- Comment #18 from Francois-Xavier
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58020
--- Comment #21 from richard.koolhans at gmail dot com ---
I'm not really an expert on any architecture. But there is an important point
that I think should not be missed. According to Van Snyder, a long-time member
of the Fortran standards
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58020
--- Comment #22 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu ---
On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 05:03:25PM +, richard.koolhans at gmail dot com
wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58020
--- Comment #21 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58020
--- Comment #11 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
The issues have hopefully been resolved and are now in the package.
See http://mathalacarte.com/hpcconsult
Thanks for the comments made above. Give feedback where it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58020
--- Comment #12 from richard.koolhans at gmail dot com ---
Thanks for doing the test with -O3. That is what I see, also. My tests show:
With -O0 everything works.
With -O1 everything runs but there are some failures.
With -O2 everything runs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58020
richard.koolhans at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||richard.koolhans at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58020
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58020
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Cross-ref: See also PR29383.
(In reply to Fred Krogh from comment #0)
Dr. Richard Hanson has written code to provide IEEE exception handling to
gfortran.
Cool! I think it should
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58020
--- Comment #6 from richard.koolhans at gmail dot com ---
Bonjour Dominique-
Le reste sera l'anglais! Voilà pour mon cours de français.
I see your bug report. There are two matters to track down here. The first
one is the diagnostic of 'PR58027'.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58020
--- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
I see your bug report. There are two matters to track down here.
The first one is the diagnostic of 'PR58027'. This may require you
to report a line number. That would be
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58020
--- Comment #8 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu ---
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 05:31:01PM +, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote:
with -m32. The gfortran rationale is that Z'FF80' is converted to the
highest integer
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58020
--- Comment #9 from Fred Krogh fkrogh#gcc at mathalacarte dot com ---
Concering Fortran language standards, our guru is W. Van Snyder a long time
member of the Fortran Standards committee. He has said to me in an email:
It's OK not to support
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58020
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58020
--- Comment #2 from Fred Krogh fkrogh#gcc at mathalacarte dot com ---
1. Hanson is willing to assign the copyright if you expect to be using this
work. There were thoughts to include this work on a SIAM website where we
think SIAM would want the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58020
--- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu ---
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 09:03:53PM +, fkrogh#gcc at mathalacarte dot com
wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58020
--- Comment #2 from Fred Krogh
26 matches
Mail list logo