[Bug libstdc++/112630] 19_diagnostics/stacktrace/output.cc execution test on cris-elf

[hp at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112630

--- Comment #4 from Hans-Peter Nilsson  ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2)
> Let's reopen this as it wasn't fixed by the patch for Bug 111641

Thanks!  I look at non-regressions at most once a year, unless there's like >10
of them at the same time.  Fixing these would handle 6 of the "# of unexpected
failures 27" for cris-elf libstdc++.

[Bug libstdc++/112630] 19_diagnostics/stacktrace/output.cc execution test on cris-elf

[redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112630

Jonathan Wakely  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|[14 Regression] |19_diagnostics/stacktrace/o
   |19_diagnostics/stacktrace/o |utput.cc execution test on
   |utput.cc execution test |cris-elf

--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely  ---
/x/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/19_diagnostics/stacktrace/entry.cc:39: void
test_members(): Assertion 'e1.source_line() == (__LINE__ - 5)' failed.
program stopped with signal 6 (Aborted).
FAIL: 19_diagnostics/stacktrace/entry.cc  -std=gnu++23 execution test

/x/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/19_diagnostics/stacktrace/output.cc:21: void
test_to_string(): Assertion 's1.contains("test_to_string()")' failed.
program stopped with signal 6 (Aborted).
FAIL: 19_diagnostics/stacktrace/output.cc  -std=gnu++23 execution test

/x/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/19_diagnostics/stacktrace/stacktrace.cc:284: void
test_assign(): Assertion 's0.at(0).source_line() == (__LINE__ - 4)' failed.
program stopped with signal 6 (Aborted).
FAIL: 19_diagnostics/stacktrace/stacktrace.cc  -std=gnu++23 execution test