https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79190
Georg Koppen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gk at torproject dot org
--- Comment #13
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79190
--- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Thu Jan 26 14:30:45 2017
New Revision: 244933
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244933=gcc=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/79190 add fallback aligned_alloc implementation
libstdc++-v3:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79190
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79190
--- Comment #10 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2017-01-24, at 1:34 PM, redi at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> Would you be able to test the patch at
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-01/msg01910.html on HPUX 11?
The patch fixes all
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79190
--- Comment #9 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2017-01-24 1:34 PM, redi at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79190
>
> --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
> Would you be able to test the patch at
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79190
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Would you be able to test the patch at
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-01/msg01910.html on HPUX 11?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79190
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The C++17 draft requires aligned-delete to be used for memory obtained from
aligned-new (and not otherwise):
"Requires: If the alignment parameter is not present, ptr shall have been
returned by an
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79190
--- Comment #6 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5)
> If aligned new must be
> always accompanied with aligned delete, then it could work, otherwise you'd
> need to wrap all new and all deletes.
We are using
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79190
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79190
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to John David Anglin from comment #2)
> Looks as if the problem is here:
>
> #else
> // The C library doesn't provide any aligned allocation functions, declare
> // aligned_alloc and get a link
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79190
--- Comment #3 from John David Anglin ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1)
> Looks like we do need to create a fall-back implementation after all, as
> Marc suggested in https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-09/msg00422.html
A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79190
--- Comment #2 from John David Anglin ---
Looks as if the problem is here:
#else
// The C library doesn't provide any aligned allocation functions, declare
// aligned_alloc and get a link failure if aligned new is used.
extern "C" void
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79190
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
13 matches
Mail list logo
