https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88677
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88677
--- Comment #16 from Jan Hubicka ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Thu Feb 14 14:49:03 2019
New Revision: 268880
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268880=gcc=rev
Log:
PR lto/88677
Fix PR number.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88677
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88677
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|rguenther at suse dot de |hubicka at gcc dot
gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88677
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenther at suse dot de
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88677
--- Comment #12 from Jan Hubicka ---
I have posted patch which removes the problematic TYPE_NEEDS_CONSTRUCTION to
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-02/msg00584.html
It however does not fix the difference. I suppose it may be TBAA
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88677
--- Comment #11 from Jan Hubicka ---
>
> I guess the FE needs the info. But yes, dropping TREE_READONLY
> for TYPE_NEEDS_CONSTRUCTION decls at some point may make sense.
>
> Generally it would be nice to know (for alias analysis) that
> an
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88677
--- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 7 Jan 2019, hubicka at ucw dot cz wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88677
>
> --- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka ---
> > https://gcc.gnu
> > -> You can't simply
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88677
--- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka ---
> https://gcc.gnu
> -> You can't simply remove this flag. You could set it to true
> conservatively.
> Or we could stop marking globals that need constructing TREE_READONLY.
I see, I was under impression
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88677
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88677
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88677
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |9.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88677
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-reduction |
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88677
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-reduction
--- Comment #5 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88677
--- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka ---
This drops TYPE_NEEDS_CONSTRUCTING. I checked the uses
jan@skylake:~/trunk/gcc> grep TYPE_NEEDS_CONSTRU *.c
gimplify.c: || TYPE_NEEDS_CONSTRUCTING (TREE_TYPE (decl
print-tree.c: if
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88677
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
16 matches
Mail list logo
