--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-17 09:06 ---
-combine has been removed from GCC 4.6 in favor of LTO, closing as WONTFIX.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #6 from acahalan at gmail dot com 2007-06-26 03:37 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> This is related to or really a dup of bug 4417.
It's only related, not a dup, though bug 4417 is sort of a subset.
There appears to be no possible set of gcc options that will allow compiling
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-25 16:44 ---
This is related to or really a dup of bug 4417.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29171
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-21 20:36 ---
Confirmed, note waiting means waiting for the reporter to get back to us about
a question, it should have been obvious anyways.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #3 from acahalan at gmail dot com 2006-09-21 18:49 ---
foo 0 $ cat foo.c
void *memcpy(void *restrict, const void *restrict, unsigned long);
void *memcpy(void *restrict dst, const void *restrict src, unsigned long n)
{
const char *p = src;
char *q = dst;
--- Comment #2 from acahalan at gmail dot com 2006-09-21 18:15 ---
A simple test case would involve the code I gave plus whatever it takes to make
gcc decide to call memcpy. What is the most simple thing which triggers that?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29171
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-21 17:57 ---
externally_visible should have fixed the undefined symbol.
Do you really have a simple testcase instead of just describing what your code
does?
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Remo
