http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45388
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45388
--- Comment #12 from Jan Hubicka 2010-12-14
01:26:51 UTC ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Tue Dec 14 01:26:47 2010
New Revision: 167781
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167781
Log:
This time really commit
PR middle-end/45388
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45388
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45388
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45388
--- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka 2010-12-13
17:29:17 UTC ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Mon Dec 13 17:29:14 2010
New Revision: 167753
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167753
Log:
PR middle-end/45388
* decl2.c (start_objec
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45388
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka 2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45388
--- Comment #7 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2010-09-26 23:21:44 UTC ---
Hi Steve,
> I have a patch I am testing. It worked on the test case but I haven't fully
> bootstrapped it.
Keep plugging away on this.
I have the sense that the brea
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45388
--- Comment #6 from Steve Ellcey 2010-09-24 23:45:28
UTC ---
I have a patch I am testing. It worked on the test case but I haven't fully
bootstrapped it.
Index: ipa.c
===
--- ipa.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45388
--- Comment #5 from Steve Ellcey 2010-09-24 22:21:38
UTC ---
I have verified that the bug shows up in r163443. Looking at the assembly
language differences between 163442 and 163443, both versions have
_GLOBAL__I_65535_0__ZN2c12f6Ev,
a global ro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45388
Steve Ellcey changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45388
--- Comment #3 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2010-08-24
15:06 ---
Subject: Re: [4.6 Regression] Global constructor not found
> Is there another consturctor calling this one? (or can you attach complette .s
> file?) Perhaps it is result of my constructor merging patch.
U
--- Comment #2 from hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-24 12:12 ---
Is there another consturctor calling this one? (or can you attach complette .s
file?) Perhaps it is result of my constructor merging patch.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45388
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45388
--- Comment #1 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-23 20:58 ---
Constructor is no longer global:
.PARAM _GLOBAL__I__ZN2c12f6Ev,PRIV_LEV=3
L$FB0035:
_GLOBAL__I__ZN2c12f6Ev:
As a result, collect2 does not find the constructor.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.
15 matches
Mail list logo