https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81889
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Dec 12 08:50:31 2017
New Revision: 255573
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255573=gcc=rev
Log:
2017-12-12 Richard Biener
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81889
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
Specifically it is PRE code hoisting hoisting (integer(kind=8)) _2 above
if (_2 > 3) making it impossible to set a SSA range info on it.
At cunroll time we still have somewhat useful info on other SSA
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81889
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 42838
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42838=edit
old non-functional patch
VRP1 has figured out ranges that bound the iteration of the loop in question
but there's
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81889
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #5)
> I wonder why forwprop doesn't simplify bb6 by pushing the RHS of the
> assignment to _40 into the use of _40 in the conditional.
>
> I'd guess the fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81889
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81889
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81889
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81889
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81889
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.3
Summary|[7 Regression]