[Bug middle-end/97769] [11 Regression] vectorizer ICE when building perlbench in SPECCPU 2017
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97769 --- Comment #6 from Tamar Christina --- Thanks Richi!
[Bug middle-end/97769] [11 Regression] vectorizer ICE when building perlbench in SPECCPU 2017
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97769 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- Fixed.
[Bug middle-end/97769] [11 Regression] vectorizer ICE when building perlbench in SPECCPU 2017
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97769 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1693746302e4306b43cb66a0afe589137069bd8e commit r11-4877-g1693746302e4306b43cb66a0afe589137069bd8e Author: Richard Biener Date: Tue Nov 10 13:36:22 2020 +0100 tree-optimization/97769 - fix assert in peeling for alignment The following removes an assert that can not easily be adjusted to cover the additional cases we now handle after the removal of the same-align DRs vector. 2020-11-10 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/97769 * tree-vect-data-refs.c (vect_update_misalignment_for_peel): Remove assert. * gcc.dg/vect/pr97769.c: New testcase.
[Bug middle-end/97769] [11 Regression] vectorizer ICE when building perlbench in SPECCPU 2017
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97769 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- OK, it's just an overzealeous assert that is too difficult to update for the additional cases we now handle. I'll remove it.
[Bug middle-end/97769] [11 Regression] vectorizer ICE when building perlbench in SPECCPU 2017
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97769 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-11-10 Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org Target||aarch64 Target Milestone|--- |11.0 Priority|P3 |P1 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Confirmed on aarch64 with a cross, doesn't ICE on x86_64. I can have a look.
