[Bug preprocessor/53404] warning column reported on comment in warning during bootstrap
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53404 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org, ||dodji at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6 from Eric Gallager --- cc-ing diagnostics maintainers
[Bug preprocessor/53404] warning column reported on comment in warning during bootstrap
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53404 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build, diagnostic Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #5 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #4) > (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #3) > > (In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #2) > > > I don't see this any longer. > > > > I think I might've seen this before, but I'll have to double-check the next > > time I bootstrap to make sure > > The warnings I get from gengtype-lex.c when bootstrapping are now: > > ../../gcc/gengtype-lex.l: In function ‘int yylex(const char**)’: > gengtype-lex.c:287:13: warning: this statement may fall through > [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] > *yy_cp = '\0'; \ > ~~~^~~ > ../../gcc/gengtype-lex.l:116:1: note: in expansion of macro > ‘YY_DO_BEFORE_ACTION’ > *yylval = XDUPVAR (const char, yytext, yyleng, yyleng + 1); > ^ ~~~ > ../../gcc/gengtype-lex.l:113:1: note: here > "~" | > ^~~~ > gengtype-lex.c:287:13: warning: this statement may fall through > [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] > *yy_cp = '\0'; \ > ~~~^~~ > ../../gcc/gengtype-lex.l:133:1: note: in expansion of macro > ‘YY_DO_BEFORE_ACTION’ > > ^ > ../../gcc/gengtype-lex.l:131:1: note: here > "ENUM_BITFIELD"{WS}?"("{WS}?{ID}{WS}?")" { > ^~~~ > > ...which is no longer in a comment, but it still seems like there's some > wrong location information involved. Separate issue or the same thing? I'm gonna assume it's the same thing and confirm this.
[Bug preprocessor/53404] warning column reported on comment in warning during bootstrap
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53404 --- Comment #4 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #3) > (In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #2) > > I don't see this any longer. > > I think I might've seen this before, but I'll have to double-check the next > time I bootstrap to make sure The warnings I get from gengtype-lex.c when bootstrapping are now: ../../gcc/gengtype-lex.l: In function ‘int yylex(const char**)’: gengtype-lex.c:287:13: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] *yy_cp = '\0'; \ ~~~^~~ ../../gcc/gengtype-lex.l:116:1: note: in expansion of macro ‘YY_DO_BEFORE_ACTION’ *yylval = XDUPVAR (const char, yytext, yyleng, yyleng + 1); ^ ~~~ ../../gcc/gengtype-lex.l:113:1: note: here "~" | ^~~~ gengtype-lex.c:287:13: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] *yy_cp = '\0'; \ ~~~^~~ ../../gcc/gengtype-lex.l:133:1: note: in expansion of macro ‘YY_DO_BEFORE_ACTION’ ^ ../../gcc/gengtype-lex.l:131:1: note: here "ENUM_BITFIELD"{WS}?"("{WS}?{ID}{WS}?")" { ^~~~ ...which is no longer in a comment, but it still seems like there's some wrong location information involved. Separate issue or the same thing?
[Bug preprocessor/53404] warning column reported on comment in warning during bootstrap
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53404 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #2) > I don't see this any longer. I think I might've seen this before, but I'll have to double-check the next time I bootstrap to make sure
[Bug preprocessor/53404] warning column reported on comment in warning during bootstrap
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53404 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed||2016-04-02 CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #2 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- I don't see this any longer.
[Bug preprocessor/53404] warning column reported on comment in warning during bootstrap
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53404 Andi Kleen andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c |preprocessor --- Comment #1 from Andi Kleen andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org 2012-05-18 16:52:59 UTC --- Probably more a preprocessor problem