[Bug rtl-optimization/105586] [11/12 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure (length) with -O2 -fno-if-conversion -mtune=power4 -fno-guess-branch-probability

2023-05-05 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105586 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|11.4|13.0

[Bug rtl-optimization/105586] [11/12 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure (length) with -O2 -fno-if-conversion -mtune=power4 -fno-guess-branch-probability

2022-11-09 Thread jskumari at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105586 Surya Kumari Jangala changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED

[Bug rtl-optimization/105586] [11/12 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure (length) with -O2 -fno-if-conversion -mtune=power4 -fno-guess-branch-probability

2022-11-08 Thread jskumari at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105586 --- Comment #12 from Surya Kumari Jangala --- Richard has clarified here (https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-November/605386.html) that backporting is not required.

[Bug rtl-optimization/105586] [11/12 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure (length) with -O2 -fno-if-conversion -mtune=power4 -fno-guess-branch-probability

2022-11-08 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105586 --- Comment #11 from Segher Boessenkool --- Ah. It's a nasty bug, so "safe side" is to *do* fix it, in my reading. But you can also say "not doing anything" (so, staying susceptible to the bug) is safer. It happens rather infrequently after

[Bug rtl-optimization/105586] [11/12 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure (length) with -O2 -fno-if-conversion -mtune=power4 -fno-guess-branch-probability

2022-11-08 Thread jskumari at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105586 --- Comment #10 from Surya Kumari Jangala --- (In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #9) > I read > as approval to backport, fwiw :-) I read that as: Since it is

[Bug rtl-optimization/105586] [11/12 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure (length) with -O2 -fno-if-conversion -mtune=power4 -fno-guess-branch-probability

2022-10-27 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105586 --- Comment #9 from Segher Boessenkool --- I read as approval to backport, fwiw :-)

[Bug rtl-optimization/105586] [11/12 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure (length) with -O2 -fno-if-conversion -mtune=power4 -fno-guess-branch-probability

2022-10-27 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105586 --- Comment #8 from Segher Boessenkool --- Please do that together with the follow-up fix only? PR107171.

[Bug rtl-optimization/105586] [11/12 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure (length) with -O2 -fno-if-conversion -mtune=power4 -fno-guess-branch-probability

2022-10-27 Thread bergner at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105586 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #7 from Peter

[Bug rtl-optimization/105586] [11/12 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure (length) with -O2 -fno-if-conversion -mtune=power4 -fno-guess-branch-probability

2022-10-19 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105586 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||13.0 Priority|P3