https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71724
--- Comment #7 from Bernd Schmidt ---
Author: bernds
Date: Mon Jan 23 16:30:55 2017
New Revision: 244817
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244817=gcc=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/71724
* combine.c (if_then_else_cond): Look
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71724
--- Comment #6 from Segher Boessenkool ---
*** Bug 77345 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71724
--- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool ---
I am using the following, which also fixes the infinite loop, and seems to
not regress code quality much at all (I found *one* pattern where it made
things one machine insn worse, involving a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71724
--- Comment #4 from Bernd Schmidt ---
Maybe we just need to test for that condition, even though it's ugly. However,
I think there are some other improvements we could make here.
Part of the problem seems to be what if_then_else_cond does on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71724
Bernd Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71724
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71724
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||helloqirun at gmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71724
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71724
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Target
