https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85410
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 110525 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85410
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||19373742 at buaa dot edu.cn
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85410
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gs...@t-online.de
--- Comment #5 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85410
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zhendong.su at inf dot ethz.ch
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85410
--- Comment #3 from Arseny Solokha ---
Testcase from #c2 doesn't fail for me anymore w/ the current trunk snapshot (as
of r265361), but the following one does:
int py, up;
void
ro (int *tr, int et)
{
while (et < 1)
{
int s7 = !!*tr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85410
--- Comment #2 from Arseny Solokha ---
Here's another snippet. gcc-8.0.0-alpha20180422 snapshot (r259553) w/ r259563
applied ICEs when compiling it for x86_64 w/ -O2 (-O3, -Os)
-ftree-slp-vectorize -fschedule-insns -fsel-sched-pipelining
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85410
Andrey Belevantsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
