[Bug rtl-optimization/85805] [7/8 Regression] Wrong code for 64 bit comparisons on avr-gcc

[segher at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85805

--- Comment #14 from Segher Boessenkool  ---
I backported it anyway.

[Bug rtl-optimization/85805] [7/8 Regression] Wrong code for 64 bit comparisons on avr-gcc

[segher at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85805

--- Comment #13 from Segher Boessenkool  ---
Author: segher
Date: Thu Feb 14 18:46:18 2019
New Revision: 26

URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=26=gcc=rev
Log:
Backport from trunk
2018-07-26  Segher Boessenkool  

PR rtl-optimization/85805
* combine.c (reg_nonzero_bits_for_combine): Only use the last set
value for hard registers if that was written in the same mode.

Modified:
branches/gcc-8-branch/gcc/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-8-branch/gcc/combine.c

[Bug rtl-optimization/85805] [7/8 Regression] Wrong code for 64 bit comparisons on avr-gcc

[segher at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85805

Segher Boessenkool  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

--- Comment #12 from Segher Boessenkool  ---
Yup, closing.

[Bug rtl-optimization/85805] [7/8 Regression] Wrong code for 64 bit comparisons on avr-gcc

[marxin at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85805

Martin Liška  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #11 from Martin Liška  ---
Segher: Then let's close it?