[Bug rtl-optimization/87708] [9 Regression] ira-shrinkwrap-prep-[12].c testcases fail after r265398

2018-11-16 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87708

--- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool  ---
The testcases are XFAILed; closing this PR now.

[Bug rtl-optimization/87708] [9 Regression] ira-shrinkwrap-prep-[12].c testcases fail after r265398

2018-11-16 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87708

Segher Boessenkool  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

--- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool  ---
.

[Bug rtl-optimization/87708] [9 Regression] ira-shrinkwrap-prep-[12].c testcases fail after r265398

2018-10-30 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87708

--- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool  ---
Author: segher
Date: Tue Oct 30 19:49:36 2018
New Revision: 265639

URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265639=gcc=rev
Log:
xfail ira-shrink-wrap-prep tests (PR87708)

After r265398, the ira-shrinkwrap-prep-[12].c tests fail on all
targets, because the IRA feature tested can only move hard registers
down, and we no longer have hard registers for the function parameters
at this stage.


gcc/testsuite/
PR rtl-optimization/87708
gcc.dg/ira-shrinkwrap-prep-1.c: xfail test.
gcc.dg/ira-shrinkwrap-prep-2.c: xfail test.

Modified:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/ira-shrinkwrap-prep-1.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/ira-shrinkwrap-prep-2.c

[Bug rtl-optimization/87708] [9 Regression] ira-shrinkwrap-prep-[12].c testcases fail after r265398

2018-10-24 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87708

Richard Biener  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Keywords||missed-optimization
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
   Last reconfirmed||2018-10-24
Version|unknown |9.0
   Target Milestone|--- |9.0
Summary|ira-shrinkwrap-prep-[12].c  |[9 Regression]
   |testcases fail after|ira-shrinkwrap-prep-[12].c
   |r265398 |testcases fail after
   ||r265398
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener  ---
Confirmed.