[Bug sanitizer/87880] [9 regression] All macOS asan execution tests FAIL

2019-08-18 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87880 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug sanitizer/87880] [9 regression] All macOS asan execution tests FAIL

2019-08-18 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87880 --- Comment #15 from Iain Sandoe --- Author: iains Date: Sun Aug 18 19:11:29 2019 New Revision: 274625 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=274625=gcc=rev Log: Darwin, libsanitizer - remove reference to __cxa_rethrow_primary_exception. For

[Bug sanitizer/87880] [9 regression] All macOS asan execution tests FAIL

2019-08-16 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87880 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW Summary|[9/10 regression]

[Bug sanitizer/87880] [9 regression] All macOS asan execution tests FAIL

2019-02-21 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87880 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek --- I guess on Linux nothing ever calls __cxa_rethrow_primary_exception, so it isn't a big deal that libasan provides a wrapper for it. If you want to introduce ASAN_HAS_CXA_RETHROW_PRIMARY_EXCEPTION, it would

[Bug sanitizer/87880] [9 regression] All macOS asan execution tests FAIL

2019-01-03 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87880 --- Comment #9 from Iain Sandoe --- So.. this is somewhat puzzling. Essentially, it seems that on macOS and Linux (at least) currently ASAN_INTERCEPT___CXA_RETHROW_PRIMARY_EXCEPTION is set unconditionally to "on" (for any target that has

[Bug sanitizer/87880] [9 regression] All macOS asan execution tests FAIL

2018-12-28 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87880 --- Comment #8 from Iain Sandoe --- I can see this on x86_64-darwin15 .. but not on darwin16, 17 or 18. please can you confirm that you definitely see this on darwin18? (and what your bootstrap compiler / config is). my tests were on 267418

[Bug sanitizer/87880] [9 regression] All macOS asan execution tests FAIL

2018-11-16 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87880 --- Comment #7 from Iain Sandoe --- I do not see any wholesale fail of asan when building/testing on darwin16 for minversion darwin14 (using the darwin14 SDK). Here, the symbol shows as dynamically looked-up. (this _is_ a problem in fact

[Bug sanitizer/87880] [9 regression] All macOS asan execution tests FAIL

2018-11-06 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87880 --- Comment #6 from Iain Sandoe --- so I looked a little more at this. As Rainer points out, the libsupc++ implementation does not provide cxa_rethrow_primary_exception whereas the libc++-abi.dylib has it. For the macOS implementations of

[Bug sanitizer/87880] [9 regression] All macOS asan execution tests FAIL

2018-11-05 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87880 --- Comment #5 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #4) > > --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > >> Weird: can you check where the definition of > >> ___cxa_rethrow_primary_exception is coming

[Bug sanitizer/87880] [9 regression] All macOS asan execution tests FAIL

2018-11-05 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87880 --- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- >> Weird: can you check where the definition of >> ___cxa_rethrow_primary_exception is coming from in your case? On my >> 10.14.2 Beta1

[Bug sanitizer/87880] [9 regression] All macOS asan execution tests FAIL

2018-11-05 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87880 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Weird: can you check where the definition of > ___cxa_rethrow_primary_exception is coming from in your case? On my > 10.14.2 Beta1 system, I only found it in libc++abi.1.dylib. I see % nm

[Bug sanitizer/87880] [9 regression] All macOS asan execution tests FAIL

2018-11-05 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87880 --- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > WORKSFORME on x86_64-apple-darwin18.2.0 configured with >

[Bug sanitizer/87880] [9 regression] All macOS asan execution tests FAIL

2018-11-05 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87880 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug sanitizer/87880] [9 regression] All macOS asan execution tests FAIL

2018-11-05 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87880 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.0