https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30974
pkoning at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30974
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30974
Paul Koning changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ni1d at arrl dot net
--- Comment #4 from Pa
--- Comment #3 from hbent at cs dot oberlin dot edu 2007-02-26 21:38
---
I'm not clear on what you're saying. Is binutils not going to work at all for
this target? It can't be built natively AFAIK, so I'm not sure what toolchain
I should be using if binutils isn't going to work.
--
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-26 21:32 ---
Actually wait, you are using binutils but this target really defaults to the
old as and not binutils at all.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30974
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-26 21:30 ---
static bool
pdp11_assemble_integer (rtx x, unsigned int size, int aligned_p)
{
if (aligned_p)
switch (size)
{
case 1:
fprintf (asm_out_file, "\t.byte\t");
output_addr_const_pdp11 (as
