http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45511
Ryan Mansfield changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45511
--- Comment #7 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-06-16 23:15:47 UTC ---
On Thu, 16 Jun 2011, rmansfield at qnx dot com wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45511
>
> --- Comment #6 from Ryan Mansfield 2011-06-16
> 23:00:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45511
--- Comment #6 from Ryan Mansfield 2011-06-16
23:00:25 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> EABI targets force 64-bit HOST_WIDE_INT, so the vast majority of users of
> the ARM port won't hit this assert. If you really care about old-ABI
> target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45511
--- Comment #5 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-06-16 21:07:00 UTC ---
On Thu, 16 Jun 2011, rmansfield at qnx dot com wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45511
>
> Ryan Mansfield changed:
>
>What|Remove
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45511
Ryan Mansfield changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
--- Comment #3 from rmansfield at qnx dot com 2010-09-03 13:02 ---
I can still reproduce it with r163811.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45511
--- Comment #2 from ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-03 10:43 ---
I don't see this with an arm-linux-gnu toolchain for r163798.
--
ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #1 from rmansfield at qnx dot com 2010-09-03 01:13 ---
Created an attachment (id=21680)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21680&action=view)
preprocessed source
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45511
