[Bug target/45805] VFP/Neon double precision register expected -- `vmovl.s16 q2,s8

2010-10-08 Thread richard.earnshaw at arm dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45805 --- Comment #10 from richard.earnshaw at arm dot com 2010-10-08 12:53:40 UTC --- I shall be out of the office from Monday 11 October until Monday 1 November; I will not have email access during most of that time, so I will read your message when I

[Bug target/45805] VFP/Neon double precision register expected -- `vmovl.s16 q2,s8

2010-10-08 Thread belagod at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45805 belagod at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/45805] VFP/Neon double precision register expected -- `vmovl.s16 q2,s8

2010-10-07 Thread belagod at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45805 --- Comment #8 from belagod at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-07 16:00:13 UTC --- Author: belagod Date: Thu Oct 7 16:00:06 2010 New Revision: 165122 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=165122 Log: 2010-10-07 Tejas Belagod PR ta

[Bug target/45805] VFP/Neon double precision register expected -- `vmovl.s16 q2,s8

2010-09-28 Thread raj.khem at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45805 --- Comment #7 from Khem Raj 2010-09-28 18:30:52 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > Created attachment 21903 [details] > vmov[l,n] fix yes the 'w' constraint will do the trick. this patch works well for me.

[Bug target/45805] VFP/Neon double precision register expected -- `vmovl.s16 q2,s8

2010-09-28 Thread belagod at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45805 --- Comment #5 from belagod at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-09-28 16:25:37 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > (In reply to comment #2) > > > (In reply to comment #1) > > > > Created attachment 21897 [details] [details] [details

[Bug target/45805] VFP/Neon double precision register expected -- `vmovl.s16 q2,s8

2010-09-28 Thread raj.khem at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45805 --- Comment #4 from Khem Raj 2010-09-28 15:22:53 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > (In reply to comment #1) > > > Created attachment 21897 [details] [details] [details] > > > Fix register specifier in instruction tem

[Bug target/45805] VFP/Neon double precision register expected -- `vmovl.s16 q2,s8

2010-09-28 Thread belagod at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45805 --- Comment #3 from belagod at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-09-28 10:58:31 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > Created attachment 21897 [details] [details] > > Fix register specifier in instruction template for vmovl. > > I tri

[Bug target/45805] VFP/Neon double precision register expected -- `vmovl.s16 q2,s8

2010-09-27 Thread raj.khem at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45805 --- Comment #2 from Khem Raj 2010-09-27 18:33:58 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > Created attachment 21897 [details] > Fix register specifier in instruction template for vmovl. I tried similar patch locally before submitting the bug (changed o