http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45815
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45815
--- Comment #8 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-09-28
18:22:19 UTC ---
Author: ian
Date: Tue Sep 28 18:22:13 2010
New Revision: 164695
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=164695
Log:
PR target/45815
* opts.c (decode_opt
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45815
--- Comment #7 from Ian Lance Taylor 2010-09-28 17:14:04
UTC ---
I'm sorry, I said options.h, but of course I meant options.c. Can you check
options.c?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45815
--- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres 2010-09-28
17:01:07 UTC ---
> Dominique: yes, but flag_split_stack should be -1 going into that code, so the
> effect of that should be to set flag_split_stack to 0. Can you confirm that
> the generated f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45815
--- Comment #5 from Ian Lance Taylor 2010-09-28 16:32:16
UTC ---
Dominique: yes, but flag_split_stack should be -1 going into that code, so the
effect of that should be to set flag_split_stack to 0. Can you confirm that
the generated file option
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45815
Jack Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||howarth at nitro dot
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45815
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres 2010-09-28
15:19:29 UTC ---
> That shouldn't happen, because flag_split_stack is initialized to -1, and you
> should only see that error if flag_split_stack != -1 in decode_options. Can
> you find out wha
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45815
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ian at airs dot com
--- Comment #2 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45815
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|x86_64-apple-darwin10.4.0 |*-darwin10.4.0
Component|c
