[Bug target/54142] [4.8 regression] ppc64 build failure - Unrecognized opcode: `sldi' (and `srdi`)

2012-08-15 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54142 --- Comment #19 from Segher Boessenkool segher at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-16 00:57:44 UTC --- Author: segher Date: Thu Aug 16 00:57:37 2012 New Revision: 190427 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=190427 Log: 2012-08-15 Segher

[Bug target/54142] [4.8 regression] ppc64 build failure - Unrecognized opcode: `sldi' (and `srdi`)

2012-08-15 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54142 Segher Boessenkool segher at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug target/54142] [4.8 regression] ppc64 build failure - Unrecognized opcode: `sldi' (and `srdi`)

2012-08-14 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54142 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug target/54142] [4.8 regression] ppc64 build failure - Unrecognized opcode: `sldi' (and `srdi`)

2012-08-14 Thread gary at intrepid dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54142 --- Comment #15 from Gary Funck gary at intrepid dot com 2012-08-14 13:17:26 UTC --- (In reply to comment #14) Yeah, IMHO it should have added %{!mpower*: %(asm_default)}} \ line instead of %{!mpowerpc*: -mcom}} \ That change fixed the

[Bug target/54142] [4.8 regression] ppc64 build failure - Unrecognized opcode: `sldi' (and `srdi`)

2012-08-14 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54142 Segher Boessenkool segher at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug target/54142] [4.8 regression] ppc64 build failure - Unrecognized opcode: `sldi' (and `srdi`)

2012-08-14 Thread dje at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54142 David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dje at gcc dot

[Bug target/54142] [4.8 regression] ppc64 build failure - Unrecognized opcode: `sldi' (and `srdi`)

2012-08-14 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54142 --- Comment #18 from Segher Boessenkool segher at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-14 22:54:35 UTC --- Right, but %{!mpowerpc*: %(asm_default)}} \ instead, since the -mpower option is no more. I didn't even pick the wrong condition branch there: the

[Bug target/54142] [4.8 regression] ppc64 build failure - Unrecognized opcode: `sldi' (and `srdi`)

2012-08-13 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54142 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug target/54142] [4.8 regression] ppc64 build failure - Unrecognized opcode: `sldi' (and `srdi`)

2012-08-13 Thread PHHargrove at lbl dot gov
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54142 --- Comment #13 from Paul H. Hargrove PHHargrove at lbl dot gov 2012-08-14 00:01:08 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) Of course, if 'sldi' and 'slri' ARE supposed to be supported in common mode, then this is a binutils bug. I've confirmed that