subject:"\[Bug target\/65010\] ppc backend generates unnecessary signed extension"

[Bug target/65010] ppc backend generates unnecessary signed extension

2024-02-29 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65010 --- Comment #13 from Segher Boessenkool --- (In reply to pthaugen from comment #11) > Another example to clean up. The back to back constant load/sign extend > sequence of rtl insns is created in each block by the block reordering pass > (.bbo)

[Bug target/65010] ppc backend generates unnecessary signed extension

2023-04-11 Thread aagarwa at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65010 Ajit Kumar Agarwal changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug target/65010] ppc backend generates unnecessary signed extension

2023-03-23 Thread bergner at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65010 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bergner at gcc dot gnu.org Last

[Bug target/65010] ppc backend generates unnecessary signed extension

2022-01-20 Thread pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65010 pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/65010] ppc backend generates unnecessary signed extension

2020-06-19 Thread wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65010 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jens.seifert at de dot ibm.com ---

[Bug target/65010] ppc backend generates unnecessary signed extension

2016-01-29 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65010 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/65010] ppc backend generates unnecessary signed extension

2016-01-29 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65010 --- Comment #9 from Martin Sebor --- I see the difference now. Thanks for clarifying it! It makes sense that these two are separate requests.

[Bug target/65010] ppc backend generates unnecessary signed extension

2016-01-27 Thread dje at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65010 David Edelsohn changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|NEW Resolution|DUPLICATE

[Bug target/65010] ppc backend generates unnecessary signed extension

2016-01-27 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65010 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Last reconfirmed|2015-03-21

[Bug target/65010] ppc backend generates unnecessary signed extension

2016-01-27 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65010 --- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor --- (In reply to David Edelsohn from comment #6) > This is not the same. There is a difference between sign extension of > arguments and sign extensions within a function. This bug points out that values

[Bug target/65010] ppc backend generates unnecessary signed extension

2015-03-21 Thread dje at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65010 David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target|powerpc64le |powerpc64-*-*

[Bug target/65010] ppc backend generates unnecessary signed extension

2015-03-06 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65010 --- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor msebor at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 34978 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34978action=edit .expand RTL dump for simplified test case from comment #1. (In reply to Jeffrey A. Law