[Bug target/71629] [7 Regression] ICE in lra_set_insn_recog_data, at lra.c:964 w/ -O2 -mlra

2016-11-27 Thread asolokha at gmx dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71629 Arseny Solokha changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/71629] [7 Regression] ICE in lra_set_insn_recog_data, at lra.c:964 w/ -O2 -mlra

2016-10-17 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71629 --- Comment #9 from Segher Boessenkool --- (In reply to Arseny Solokha from comment #8) > Well, snippets from #c0 and #c2 still make the latest snapshot ICE: Hrm, in comment 5 it all worked for me. I'll test again. > And I still can't

[Bug target/71629] [7 Regression] ICE in lra_set_insn_recog_data, at lra.c:964 w/ -O2 -mlra

2016-10-16 Thread asolokha at gmx dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71629 --- Comment #8 from Arseny Solokha --- Well, snippets from #c0 and #c2 still make the latest snapshot ICE: % /var/tmp/portage/cross-powerpc-e500v2-linux-gnuspe/gcc-7.0.0_alpha20161016/work/build/./gcc/xgcc

[Bug target/71629] [7 Regression] ICE in lra_set_insn_recog_data, at lra.c:964 w/ -O2 -mlra

2016-10-16 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71629 --- Comment #7 from Segher Boessenkool --- Is this the same bug at all? If not, please open a new PR.

[Bug target/71629] [7 Regression] ICE in lra_set_insn_recog_data, at lra.c:964 w/ -O2 -mlra

2016-10-16 Thread LpSolit at netscape dot net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71629 Arseny Solokha changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug target/71629] [7 Regression] ICE in lra_set_insn_recog_data, at lra.c:964 w/ -O2 -mlra

2016-08-13 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71629 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/71629] [7 Regression] ICE in lra_set_insn_recog_data, at lra.c:964 w/ -O2 -mlra

2016-08-13 Thread asolokha at gmx dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71629 --- Comment #4 from Arseny Solokha --- (In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #3) > I cannot reproduce either with a non-SPE compiler. Does it happen with > current trunk for you? I failed to build current trunk for SPE target last

[Bug target/71629] [7 Regression] ICE in lra_set_insn_recog_data, at lra.c:964 w/ -O2 -mlra

2016-08-13 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71629 --- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool --- I cannot reproduce either with a non-SPE compiler. Does it happen with current trunk for you?

[Bug target/71629] [7 Regression] ICE in lra_set_insn_recog_data, at lra.c:964 w/ -O2 -mlra

2016-08-11 Thread asolokha at gmx dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71629 --- Comment #2 from Arseny Solokha --- gcc ICEs w/ the same error but different backtrace compiling the following testcase w/ -Os -mlra: int z4, pe; long long int wv, ca, hv, a5; void kw (int d9) { for (;;) { int f4 = 0; if (ca !=

[Bug target/71629] [7 Regression] ICE in lra_set_insn_recog_data, at lra.c:964 w/ -O2 -mlra

2016-08-09 Thread asolokha at gmx dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71629 --- Comment #1 from Arseny Solokha --- -fstack-protector -fPIC are also necessary here, just like in PR71680.

[Bug target/71629] [7 Regression] ICE in lra_set_insn_recog_data, at lra.c:964 w/ -O2 -mlra

2016-06-26 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71629 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0