[Bug target/78020] [AArch64] vuzp{1,2}q_f64 implementation identical to vzip{1,2}q_f64 in arm_neon.h and probably incorrect

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78020 --- Comment #6 from Christophe Monat --- James, (In reply to James Greenhalgh from comment #5) > This bug looks invalid to me. I think you're both failing to grasp the > intuition behind these intrinsics. Ignoring the descriptions in the > refer

[Bug target/78020] [AArch64] vuzp{1,2}q_f64 implementation identical to vzip{1,2}q_f64 in arm_neon.h and probably incorrect

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78020 James Greenhalgh changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug target/78020] [AArch64] vuzp{1,2}q_f64 implementation identical to vzip{1,2}q_f64 in arm_neon.h and probably incorrect

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78020 --- Comment #4 from Yvan Roux --- > Yes, you're right Yvan. > James just went through it with me on a board and they are indeed equivalent. > Sorry for the confusion. No worries, this kind of thing is tricky and deserve board drawings, It's a r

[Bug target/78020] [AArch64] vuzp{1,2}q_f64 implementation identical to vzip{1,2}q_f64 in arm_neon.h and probably incorrect

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78020 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug target/78020] [AArch64] vuzp{1,2}q_f64 implementation identical to vzip{1,2}q_f64 in arm_neon.h and probably incorrect

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78020 Yvan Roux changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yroux at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 from

[Bug target/78020] [AArch64] vuzp{1,2}q_f64 implementation identical to vzip{1,2}q_f64 in arm_neon.h and probably incorrect

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78020 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Keywords|