https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78603
--- Comment #7 from jcmvbkbc at gcc dot gnu.org ---
*** Bug 67586 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78603
--- Comment #6 from jcmvbkbc at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jcmvbkbc
Date: Wed May 31 00:05:38 2017
New Revision: 248714
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248714=gcc=rev
Log:
xtensa: Fix PR target/78603
2017-05-30 Max Filippov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78603
--- Comment #5 from jcmvbkbc at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jcmvbkbc
Date: Tue May 30 23:41:58 2017
New Revision: 248708
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248708=gcc=rev
Log:
xtensa: Fix PR target/78603
2017-05-30 Max Filippov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78603
jcmvbkbc at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78603
--- Comment #3 from jcmvbkbc at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jcmvbkbc
Date: Tue Nov 29 22:22:13 2016
New Revision: 242979
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242979=gcc=rev
Log:
xtensa: Fix PR target/78603
2016-11-29 Max Filippov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78603
--- Comment #2 from jcmvbkbc at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Similar bug: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48214
And looks like the same problem here: first instruction of zero overhead loop
got inserted between the call and its
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78603
--- Comment #1 from jcmvbkbc at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 40193
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40193=edit
additional patch on top of gcc-5.4.0
