https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81356
Wilco changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81356
Wilco changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wilco at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9 from Wil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81356
--- Comment #8 from Steve Ellcey ---
Author: sje
Date: Tue Nov 21 00:18:14 2017
New Revision: 254977
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254977&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-11-20 Steve Ellcey
PR target/81356
* gfortran.dg/pr4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81356
--- Comment #7 from Steve Ellcey ---
Author: sje
Date: Fri Nov 17 22:44:32 2017
New Revision: 254901
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254901&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-11-17 Steve Ellcey
PR target/81356
* config/aarch64/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81356
--- Comment #6 from Qing Zhao ---
just found that a similar fix have been submitted 2 weeks ago to gcc_patches:
https://www.mail-archive.com/gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org/msg173652.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81356
--- Comment #5 from Qing Zhao ---
the following code in config/aarch64/aarch64.c cause such behavior:
14143 static bool
14144 aarch64_use_by_pieces_infrastructure_p (unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT size,
14145 unsi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81356
Qing Zhao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||qing.zhao at oracle dot com
--- Comment #4 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81356
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
A GIMPLE level optimization to *a = '\0'; would still be ok but I agree with
Andrew.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81356
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|tree-optimization |target
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski
