[Bug target/84248] [8 Regression] r257414 failed too bootstrap in libitm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84248 Bug 84248 depends on bug 84145, which changed state. Bug 84145 Summary: Wrong CET options processing https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84145 What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED
[Bug target/84248] [8 Regression] r257414 failed too bootstrap in libitm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84248 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Fixed.
[Bug target/84248] [8 Regression] r257414 failed too bootstrap in libitm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84248 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||doko at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu --- *** Bug 84259 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
[Bug target/84248] [8 Regression] r257414 failed too bootstrap in libitm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84248 --- Comment #5 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: hjl Date: Wed Feb 7 10:48:39 2018 New Revision: 257444 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257444&root=gcc&view=rev Log: i386: Mask out the CF_SET bit for -fcf-protection check Since ix86_option_override_internal sets the CF_SET bit in flag_cf_protection and it can be called more than once via pragma, we need to mask out the CF_SET bit when checking flag_cf_protection. PR target/84248 * config/i386/i386.c (ix86_option_override_internal): Mask out the CF_SET bit when checking -fcf-protection. Modified: trunk/gcc/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
[Bug target/84248] [8 Regression] r257414 failed too bootstrap in libitm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84248 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build, ice-on-valid-code Component|bootstrap |target Target Milestone|--- |8.0 Summary|r257414 failed too |[8 Regression] r257414 |bootstrap in libitm |failed too bootstrap in ||libitm