https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85961
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85961
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||12.1.0
--- Comment #7 from Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85961
--- Comment #6 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
On Fri, 15 Jun 2018, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> So - all process_options () option post-processing should go away and be moved
> to finish_options ()?
I think reducing the amount
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85961
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85961
--- Comment #4 from bki at hacon dot de ---
(In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #3)
> You'd need to disable IPA-RA after forcing -O2 with the pragma, i.e.:
>
> #pragma GCC optimize "O2"
> #pragma GCC optimize "no-ipa-ra"
Yes, this
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85961
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85961
--- Comment #2 from bki at hacon dot de ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> To me it shoulds you are messing with the ABI behind GCCs back.
True.
I'd still argue that the SysV-ABI suggests that a caller would need to save and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85961
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ra
Target|
