[Bug target/86589] [8 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/altivec-7-le.c and gcc.target/powerpc/vsx-7-be.c fail starting with r262440
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86589 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WONTFIX CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- The GCC 8 branch is being closed.
[Bug target/86589] [8 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/altivec-7-le.c and gcc.target/powerpc/vsx-7-be.c fail starting with r262440
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86589 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|8.4 |8.5 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 8.4.0 has been released, adjusting target milestone.
[Bug target/86589] [8 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/altivec-7-le.c and gcc.target/powerpc/vsx-7-be.c fail starting with r262440
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86589 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|8.3 |8.4 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 8.3 has been released.
[Bug target/86589] [8 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/altivec-7-le.c and gcc.target/powerpc/vsx-7-be.c fail starting with r262440
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86589 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|8.2 |8.3 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- GCC 8.2 has been released.
[Bug target/86589] [8 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/altivec-7-le.c and gcc.target/powerpc/vsx-7-be.c fail starting with r262440
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86589 --- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- I just checked and 8.1.0 was OK
[Bug target/86589] [8 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/altivec-7-le.c and gcc.target/powerpc/vsx-7-be.c fail starting with r262440
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86589 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org Known to work||8.1.0 Target Milestone|--- |8.2 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- I suppose 8.1.0 worked?