https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96895
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|https://gitlab.com/x86-psAB |
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96895
--- Comment #7 from Michael Matz ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5)
> So vector types with element type T and N, a power-of-two, not otherwise
> specified are passes the same as
>
> struct S { T a[N] };
>
> ?
No. structs, if
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96895
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5)
> (In reply to Michael Matz from comment #2)
> > The psABI doesn't say anything about such types, no. Maybe it could in some
> > additional info pages, but it's
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96895
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Michael Matz from comment #2)
> The psABI doesn't say anything about such types, no. Maybe it could in some
> additional info pages, but it's always a problem to codify behaviour
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96895
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Michael Matz from comment #2)
> The psABI doesn't say anything about such types, no. Maybe it could in some
> additional info pages, but it's always a problem to codify behaviour
> retroactively
> in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96895
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://gitlab.com/x86-psAB
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96895
--- Comment #2 from Michael Matz ---
The psABI doesn't say anything about such types, no. Maybe it could in some
additional info pages, but it's always a problem to codify behaviour
retroactively
in it, when conflicting implementations already
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96895
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*
Keywords|
