https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103161
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103161
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7c8a416da86c175bcb5fa7b49abf3cf343bc068f
commit r12-5134-g7c8a416da86c175bcb5fa7b49abf3cf343bc068f
Author: Martin Sebor
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103161
--- Comment #9 from Martin Sebor ---
Aaah, never mind. The test depends on the unspecified order of argument
evaluation. Doh!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103161
--- Comment #8 from Aldy Hernandez ---
https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/eval_order
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103161
--- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor ---
I bet you can't see the failures because they depend on fixes in a patch that
hasn't been committed yet:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-November/583735.html
But I wonder if there actually
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103161
--- Comment #6 from Aldy Hernandez ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #5)
> Great! With the strlen conversion to ranger
> (g:6b8b959675a3e14cfdd2145bd62e4260eb193765) the test now fails on x86_64 as
> well:
I didn't see any
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103161
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|tree-optimization |testsuite
--- Comment #5 from Martin
