[Bug testsuite/45664] All ifunc tests fail on Solaris 2

2010-10-01 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org 
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45664

Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p
   ||atches/2010-09/msg02070.htm
   ||l
 Resolution||FIXED

--- Comment #5 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-01 13:53:29 UTC 
---
Fixed for 4.6.0.

[Bug testsuite/45664] All ifunc tests fail on Solaris 2

2010-09-14 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-09-14 10:19 ---
They also fail on old glibc systems.  Nathan, you need to add some
dg-effective-target machinery and check availability of runtime support.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
 Ever Confirmed|0   |1
   Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2010-09-14 10:19:38
   date||


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45664

[Bug testsuite/45664] All ifunc tests fail on Solaris 2

2010-09-14 Thread nathan at codesourcery dot com 


--- Comment #3 from nathan at codesourcery dot com  2010-09-14 10:23 ---
Subject: Re:  All ifunc tests fail on Solaris 2

On 09/14/10 11:19, rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
 --- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-09-14 10:19 
 ---
 They also fail on old glibc systems.  Nathan, you need to add some
 dg-effective-target machinery and check availability of runtime support.

yes, I'm testing a patch that checks the glibc version number -- I'm reluctant 
to try a more dynamic test as the whole point of these tests is to make sure it 
actually works, and disabling them in the face of failure seems unwise :)

nathan


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45664

[Bug testsuite/45664] All ifunc tests fail on Solaris 2

2010-09-14 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE 


--- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE  2010-09-14 
11:40 ---
Subject: Re:  All ifunc tests fail on Solaris 2

 --- Comment #3 from nathan at codesourcery dot com  2010-09-14 10:23 
 ---

 yes, I'm testing a patch that checks the glibc version number -- I'm 
 reluctant 
 to try a more dynamic test as the whole point of these tests is to make sure 
 it 
 actually works, and disabling them in the face of failure seems unwise :)

If it requires support from GNU ld and/or the glibc ld.so, check for
that and disable the support on other platforms.

Rainer


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45664

[Bug testsuite/45664] All ifunc tests fail on Solaris 2

2010-09-13 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 


--- Comment #1 from ro at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-09-13 20:18 ---
All the new ifunc tests fail on Solaris 2 (at least Solaris 10/x86):

FAIL: g++.dg/ext/attr-ifunc-1.C execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/ext/attr-ifunc-2.C execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/ext/attr-ifunc-3.C execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/ext/attr-ifunc-4.C execution test

FAIL: gcc.dg/attr-ifunc-1.c execution test
FAIL: gcc.dg/attr-ifunc-3.c execution test
FAIL: gcc.dg/attr-ifunc-4.c execution test
FAIL: gcc.dg/attr-ifunc-5.c execution test

E.g. gcc.dg/attr-ifunc-1.exe exits with code 1.

Nathan, could you please have a look?  I've no idea what sort of ld and/or
ld.so.1 support is required to make the attribute work.


-- 

ro at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|All ifunc tests fail on |All ifunc tests fail on
   |Solaris 2   |Solaris 2


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45664