[Bug testsuite/92466] new test case gfortran.dg/ISO_Fortran_binding_15.f90 in r278025 fails

2023-07-07 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92466

Richard Biener  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|10.5|---

[Bug testsuite/92466] new test case gfortran.dg/ISO_Fortran_binding_15.f90 in r278025 fails

2022-06-28 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92466

Jakub Jelinek  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|10.4|10.5

--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek  ---
GCC 10.4 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 10.5.

[Bug testsuite/92466] new test case gfortran.dg/ISO_Fortran_binding_15.f90 in r278025 fails

2021-04-08 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92466

Richard Biener  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|10.3|10.4

--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener  ---
GCC 10.3 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 10.4.

[Bug testsuite/92466] new test case gfortran.dg/ISO_Fortran_binding_15.f90 in r278025 fails

2020-07-22 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92466

Richard Biener  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|10.2|10.3

--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener  ---
GCC 10.2 is released, adjusting target milestone.

[Bug testsuite/92466] new test case gfortran.dg/ISO_Fortran_binding_15.f90 in r278025 fails

2020-05-07 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92466

Jakub Jelinek  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|10.0|10.2

--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek  ---
GCC 10.1 has been released.

[Bug testsuite/92466] new test case gfortran.dg/ISO_Fortran_binding_15.f90 in r278025 fails

2019-11-13 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92466

Tobias Burnus  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus  ---
See PR 92123 comment 5, 7 and 8.

[Bug testsuite/92466] new test case gfortran.dg/ISO_Fortran_binding_15.f90 in r278025 fails

2019-11-12 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92466

Rainer Orth  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Target|powerpc64*-linux-gnu|powerpc64*-linux-gnu,
   ||i?86-*-*, sparc-*-*,
   ||aarch64-*-*
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
   Last reconfirmed||2019-11-12
 CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org
   Host|powerpc64*-linux-gnu|
   Target Milestone|--- |10.0
 Ever confirmed|0   |1
  Build|powerpc64*-linux-gnu|

--- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth  ---
Happens on several more targets.  E.g. on Solaris/SPARC it SEGVs:

Thread 2 received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching to Thread 1 (LWP 1)]
0x00011134 in main ()
at
/vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/ISO_Fortran_binding_15.c:29
29if (*(int *)dat.base_addr != 42)
(gdb) where
#0  0x00011134 in main ()
at
/vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/ISO_Fortran_binding_15.c:29
(gdb) p dat.base_addr
$1 = (void *) 0x0