https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113281
--- Comment #23 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1a8261e047f7a2c2b0afb95716f7615cba718cd1
commit r14-8492-g1a8261e047f7a2c2b0afb95716f7615cba718cd1
Author: Richard Sandiford
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113281
Richard Sandiford changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rsandifo at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113281
--- Comment #21 from Jakub Jelinek ---
So, I think
--- gcc/tree-vect-patterns.cc.jj2024-01-03 11:51:37.487648527 +0100
+++ gcc/tree-vect-patterns.cc 2024-01-24 14:05:55.911356481 +0100
@@ -3002,6 +3002,12 @@
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113281
--- Comment #20 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #18)
> But they are not correct for logical right shifts and they don't handle left
> shifts.
Oh, and then there are rotates and I think we need to punt on those,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113281
--- Comment #19 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 24 Jan 2024, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113281
>
> --- Comment #17 from Andrew Pinski ---
> (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113281
--- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #17)
> (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #16)
> > On Wed, 24 Jan 2024, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> >
> > >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113281
--- Comment #17 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #16)
> On Wed, 24 Jan 2024, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113281
> >
> > --- Comment #15 from Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113281
--- Comment #16 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 24 Jan 2024, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113281
>
> --- Comment #15 from Andrew Pinski ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113281
--- Comment #15 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #14)
> a >= 16 ? 0 : 32872 >> MIN (a, 15) (the MIN is still required to
> avoid requiring masking).
Note maybe instead of MIN here we use `a & 0xf` since that will
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113281
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||110838
--- Comment #14 from Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113281
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
11 matches
Mail list logo