[Bug tree-optimization/15596] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Missed optimization with bitfields with return value

[steven at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #18 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-08-06 23:12 ---
Martin, perhaps a test case you want to watch if you or someone else is going
to play with SRA vs. bitfields.


-- 

steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot
   ||org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15596

[Bug tree-optimization/15596] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Missed optimization with bitfields with return value

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #17 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-05-22 18:10 
---
GCC 4.3.5 is being released, adjusting target milestone.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|4.3.5   |4.3.6


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15596