http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43959
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43959
--- Comment #21 from John David Anglin 2010-10-01
00:47:13 UTC ---
Author: danglin
Date: Fri Oct 1 00:47:09 2010
New Revision: 164824
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=164824
Log:
PR tree-optimization/43959
* functio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43959
--- Comment #20 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2010-09-30 13:13:05 UTC ---
> > > Ah. The following fixes it for me on a cross. Can you bootstrap &
> > > regtest and
> > > install it? It's pre-approved if it works for you.
> >
> > Will tes
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43959
--- Comment #19 from Richard Guenther 2010-09-30
11:19:52 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #18)
> Subject: Re: [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/builtin-cproj-1.c -O1
> (test for excess errors)
>
> > Ah. The following fixes it for me on a cr
--- Comment #18 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2010-09-19
14:53 ---
Subject: Re: [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/builtin-cproj-1.c -O1
(test for excess errors)
> Ah. The following fixes it for me on a cross. Can you bootstrap & regtest
> and
> install it? It's
--- Comment #17 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-19 11:10
---
Ah. The following fixes it for me on a cross. Can you bootstrap & regtest and
install it? It's pre-approved if it works for you.
Thanks.
Index: gcc/function.c
==
--- Comment #16 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2010-09-18
22:14 ---
Subject: Re: [4.6 Regression] FAIL:
gcc.dg/torture/builtin-cproj-1.c -O1 (test for excess errors)
On Sat, 18 Sep 2010, rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> --- Comment #14 from rguenth a
--- Comment #15 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2010-09-18
18:59 ---
Subject: Re: [4.6 Regression] FAIL:
gcc.dg/torture/builtin-cproj-1.c -O1 (test for excess errors)
On Sat, 18 Sep 2010, rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
>
>
> --- Comment #14 from rgu
--- Comment #14 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-18 18:25
---
You have way more non-SSA variables - possibly due to callee-copy of args
(again).
I suppose some optimizations end up being disabled for some reason by that,
but likely nobody will be interested to fixup missed o
--
danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
Component|testsuite |tree-optimization
10 matches
Mail list logo
