[Bug tree-optimization/58554] [4.9 Regression] Revision 202619 causes runtime failure in CPU2006 benchmark 445.gobmk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58554 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Mine.
[Bug tree-optimization/58554] [4.9 Regression] Revision 202619 causes runtime failure in CPU2006 benchmark 445.gobmk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58554 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Ok, this one shows that pattern detection does not consider conditionally executed stores properly. I have a fix.
[Bug tree-optimization/58554] [4.9 Regression] Revision 202619 causes runtime failure in CPU2006 benchmark 445.gobmk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58554 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Sep 30 12:22:00 2013 New Revision: 203031 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=203031root=gccview=rev Log: 2013-09-30 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de PR tree-optimization/58554 * tree-loop-distribution.c (classify_partition): Require unconditionally executed stores for memcpy and memset recognition. (tree_loop_distribution): Calculate dominance info. * gcc.dg/torture/pr58554.c: New testcase. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr58554.c Modified: trunk/gcc/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/tree-loop-distribution.c
[Bug tree-optimization/58554] [4.9 Regression] Revision 202619 causes runtime failure in CPU2006 benchmark 445.gobmk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58554 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Fixed.
[Bug tree-optimization/58554] [4.9 Regression] Revision 202619 causes runtime failure in CPU2006 benchmark 445.gobmk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58554 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||Ganesh.Gopalasubramanian@am ||d.com --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- *** Bug 58577 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
[Bug tree-optimization/58554] [4.9 Regression] Revision 202619 causes runtime failure in CPU2006 benchmark 445.gobmk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58554 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0 Summary|Revision 202619 causes |[4.9 Regression] Revision |runtime failure in CPU2006 |202619 causes runtime |benchmark 445.gobmk |failure in CPU2006 ||benchmark 445.gobmk Severity|normal |blocker
[Bug tree-optimization/58554] [4.9 Regression] Revision 202619 causes runtime failure in CPU2006 benchmark 445.gobmk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58554 Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC||law at redhat dot com Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com --- Duplicate. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 58553 ***
[Bug tree-optimization/58554] [4.9 Regression] Revision 202619 causes runtime failure in CPU2006 benchmark 445.gobmk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58554 Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Last reconfirmed||2013-09-27 Resolution|DUPLICATE |--- Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #2 from Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com --- Since this doesn't depend on the recent threading changes to trigger, I'm keeping this open as I'll probably revert a tiny piece of the threading changes which will make 58553 go latent.
