[Bug tree-optimization/64322] More optimize opportunity for constant folding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64322 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|---

[Bug tree-optimization/64322] More optimize opportunity for constant folding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64322 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2014-12-16 00:00:00 |2018-11-19 --- Comment #10 from Richard

[Bug tree-optimization/64322] More optimize opportunity for constant folding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64322 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #9

[Bug tree-optimization/64322] More optimize opportunity for constant folding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64322 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement

[Bug tree-optimization/64322] More optimize opportunity for constant folding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64322 --- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 17 Dec 2014, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64322 > > --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- So, is > this fix acceptable to the reporter?

[Bug tree-optimization/64322] More optimize opportunity for constant folding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64322 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- So, is this fix acceptable to the reporter? The explanation in the combiner is that in the first testcase you have multiple uses of the load of 0x1L constant and therefore it is not attempted to be c

[Bug tree-optimization/64322] More optimize opportunity for constant folding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64322 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Dec 17 09:29:12 2014 New Revision: 218812 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218812&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/64322 * tree-vrp.c (extract_range_from_binary

[Bug tree-optimization/64322] More optimize opportunity for constant folding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64322 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4) > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3) > > For VRP I'm thinking of (completely untested): > > --- gcc/tree-vrp.c.jj 2014-12-01 14:57:30.0 +010

[Bug tree-optimization/64322] More optimize opportunity for constant folding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64322 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3) > For VRP I'm thinking of (completely untested): > --- gcc/tree-vrp.c.jj 2014-12-01 14:57:30.0 +0100 > +++ gcc/tree-vrp.c2014-12-16 10:17:27.543111649

[Bug tree-optimization/64322] More optimize opportunity for constant folding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64322 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- For VRP I'm thinking of (completely untested): --- gcc/tree-vrp.c.jj2014-12-01 14:57:30.0 +0100 +++ gcc/tree-vrp.c2014-12-16 10:17:27.543111649 +0100 @@ -2434,6 +2434,7 @@ extract_range_from_b

[Bug tree-optimization/64322] More optimize opportunity for constant folding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64322 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/64322] More optimize opportunity for constant folding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64322 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1