https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66917
--- Comment #18 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to ktkachov from comment #17)
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #16)
Created attachment 36099 [details]
patch
I am testing the attached (on x86_64-linux), it fixes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66917
--- Comment #16 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 36099
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36099action=edit
patch
I am testing the attached (on x86_64-linux), it fixes the testcase with a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66917
--- Comment #17 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #16)
Created attachment 36099 [details]
patch
I am testing the attached (on x86_64-linux), it fixes the testcase with a
cross to arm. Full
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66917
Richard Earnshaw rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66917
--- Comment #15 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
For both loads and stores we do
else if (DR_MISALIGNMENT (first_dr) == -1)
{
TREE_TYPE (data_ref)
=
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66917
--- Comment #14 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 30 Jul 2015, rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66917
Richard Earnshaw rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66917
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66917
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.4
