[Bug tree-optimization/82588] missing -Warray-bounds on a excessively large index
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82588 --- Comment #6 from David Malcolm --- Author: dmalcolm Date: Wed Nov 22 21:12:36 2017 New Revision: 255082 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255082=gcc=rev Log: jit: update test suite for change to -Warray-bounds jit.dg/test-error-array-bounds.c is a test of how libgccjit handles errors coming from the middle-end, using -Warray-bounds as an example. It started failing as of r254830 (aka 987b3316c4e7c908e3c7d2151c20971f9707ad66), due to that commit changing the wording of the message. This commit fixes the jit testcase by updating it to use the new wording. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: PR tree-optimization/82588 PR tree-optimization/82583 * jit.dg/test-error-array-bounds.c (verify_code): Update expected error message from -Warray-bounds. Modified: trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/testsuite/jit.dg/test-error-array-bounds.c
[Bug tree-optimization/82588] missing -Warray-bounds on a excessively large index
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82588 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||8.0 Target Milestone|--- |8.0 Known to fail||5.4.0, 6.4.0, 7.2.0
[Bug tree-optimization/82588] missing -Warray-bounds on a excessively large index
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82588 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill ||a/show_bug.cgi?id=82455 Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor --- The -Warrray-bounds part of the issue has been fixed in r254830. GCC now issues the warnings below for the test case in comment #0: a.c: In function ‘f1’: a.c:17:11: warning: array subscript 4611686018427387904 is above array bounds of ‘int[]’ [-Warray-bounds] return a[__SIZE_MAX__ / sizeof (int) + 1]; // missing -Warray-bounds ~^ a.c: In function ‘f2’: a.c:22:14: warning: array subscript 9223372036854775807 is above array bounds of ‘char[]’ [-Warray-bounds] return a->a[__SIZE_MAX__ / 2]; // missing -Warray-bounds ^~ The out-of-bounds offset is still not diagnosed. It's the subject of a separate bug (pr82455).
[Bug tree-optimization/82588] missing -Warray-bounds on a excessively large index
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82588 --- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Thu Nov 16 16:12:36 2017 New Revision: 254830 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254830=gcc=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/82588 - missing -Warray-bounds on a excessively large index PR tree-optimization/82583 - missing -Warray-bounds on out-of-bounds inner indic gcc/ChangeLog: PR tree-optimization/82588 PR tree-optimization/82583 * tree-vrp.c (check_array_ref): Handle flexible array members, string literals, and inner indices. (search_for_addr_array): Add detail to diagnostics. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: PR tree-optimization/82588 PR tree-optimization/82583 * c-c++-common/Warray-bounds.c: New test. * gcc.dg/Warray-bounds-11.c: Adjust. * gcc.dg/Warray-bounds-22.c: New test. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Warray-bounds.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/Warray-bounds-22.c Modified: trunk/gcc/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/Warray-bounds-11.c trunk/gcc/tree-vrp.c
[Bug tree-optimization/82588] missing -Warray-bounds on a excessively large index
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82588 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor --- Patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-10/msg01122.html
[Bug tree-optimization/82588] missing -Warray-bounds on a excessively large index
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82588 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed||2017-10-18 Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |msebor at gcc dot gnu.org Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor --- Testing a fix.
[Bug tree-optimization/82588] missing -Warray-bounds on a excessively large index
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82588 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill ||a/show_bug.cgi?id=68325 --- Comment #1 from Martin Sebor --- See also bug 68325 for a similar report of -Warray-bounds failing to detect negative indices into flexible array members.