[Bug tree-optimization/83456] -Wrestrict false positive on a non-overlapping memcpy in an inline function

2018-03-12 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83456 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/83456] -Wrestrict false positive on a non-overlapping memcpy in an inline function

2018-03-12 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83456 --- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Mon Mar 12 18:04:16 2018 New Revision: 258455 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258455=gcc=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/83456 - -Wrestrict false positive on a non-overlapping memcpy

[Bug tree-optimization/83456] -Wrestrict false positive on a non-overlapping memcpy in an inline function

2018-03-07 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83456 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch Status|NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/83456] -Wrestrict false positive on a non-overlapping memcpy in an inline function

2018-02-06 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83456 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug tree-optimization/83456] -Wrestrict false positive on a non-overlapping memcpy in an inline function

2018-02-06 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83456 --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor --- And another test case from bug 84095 comment #9, also due to the check in gimple-fold.c. This one seems closer to the first test case in comment #0. $ cat t.c && gcc -O2 -S -Wall t.c extern void* memcpy

[Bug tree-optimization/83456] -Wrestrict false positive on a non-overlapping memcpy in an inline function

2018-02-06 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83456 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|